This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2023 WL 5017711 (D. July 28, 2023). Also, “The complaint does not allege specific facts to support an inference that Facebook has assumed a traditional public function, that the state coerced Facebook’s conduct, or that Facebook and the state are interdependent.” Platkin, 2023 WL 6389744 (D.N.J.
But courts may take divergent paths on those issues, especially given the fact-specific nature of many of the plaintiffs challenges, which depend not only on their specific claimed rights but also on the way each AI company has trained their model and how those models function. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
It says it quickly attracted 170 DMCA notices a day, 63% from Shein–a total of 33k notices by the end of 2023. The court refuses Temu’s preliminary injunction request. Day to Day Imports * Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police InfringementSunny Factory v. Alper Automotive v.
He brought a statecourt class action lawsuit against Ripoff Report, alleging violations of CA B&P 17200 and the implied covenant of good faith. Ripoff Report removed the case to federal court. The plaintiff successfully remanded the case back to statecourt and got some of its attorneys’ fees covered.
district court granted summary judgment for the Copyright Office in Thaler v. 18, 2023), affirming the Copyright Office’s position that “a work generated entirely by an artificial system absent human involvement [is not] eligible for copyright.” As one example of this, the district court pointed to Urantia Found.
The court rules for Reddit on all counts. The court says Rogozinski doesn’t have priority over Reddit. The court does not credit Rogozinski’s role in creating the subreddit as a use in commerce, and Rogozinski’s other uses (such as the book title) don’t count either. StateLaw Claims.
The court summarizes the plaintiff’s allegations: Plaintiff alleges that in October, 2020, he received a negative review on Nextdoor from a former customer. ” The court cites Force v. The plaintiff claimed that federal law didn’t preempt his statelaw claim, but the court breezily rejects that. (I
Ottawa Faculty of Law, CA Six major book publishers Friday sued the Florida Department of Education, challenging a 2023statelaw used to restrict books in school libraries. The Court found that where work is not considered obscene, it is constitutionally protected expression under the First Amendment.
The court easily dismisses per Section 230: ICS Provider. Numerous courts have held Google is one. ” The court summarizes: “Google has immunity from her statelaw claims, as it cannot be held liable for search engine results showing a third party’s statement.” Publisher/Speaker Claims.
Data Protection Authority powers: The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has ruled that Data Protection Authorities are not obliged to exercise corrective powers in the event of a breach. The German courts referred the interpretation of GDPR to the CJEU. This includes products such as software, webcams and smart TVs.
Additionally, the American Bar Association (ABA) collects employment data for each year’s graduating law class from only ABA accredited law schools. of law school graduates in 2023 were employed in “JD Advantage” positionsroles where a law degree is preferred but not required to take the bar exam.
On April 27, 2023, the Advocate General (“AG”) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued its opinion in the case C-807/21 on the conditions for imposing GDPR fines on legal persons (e.g., Member Stateslaws may not require this to be a pre-condition to impose a GDPR administrative fine. (2)
Laura Heymann (William & Mary Law) Jeffrey Hunt Angie Jin Josh King Jonathan Klinger Prof. Stacey Lantagne (now of Western New England Law) Prof. Christa Laser (Cleveland StateLaw) Prof. Yassine Lefouili (Toulouse School of Economics) David Levine (Elon Law) Yoram Lichtenstein Prof. Jeff Kosseff (U.S.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted.
That section states that rights under statelaws that are “equivalent” to rights under copyright law are preempted. There are more than 300 opinions by federal courts dealing with the express preemption of contracts, and within them two main approaches have emerged. ML Genius v. A third approach?
Note that the data localization prohibition in this Regulation applies to individual EU Member States’ laws; it does not preclude the EU from implementing data localization requirements.
Businesses may want to consider how the courts reasoning may apply to other circumstances when dealing with disclosure requests. These developments, and more, covered below.
In April 2023, popular Big Brother reality TV star Kyland Young sued NeoCortex, Inc. , the developer of Reface, a deep fake software program, claiming the product violates California’s right of publicity law. StateLaw Several states have passed laws to limit the harmful effects of deep fakes.
Marlene Gebauer 1:34 Yeah, and this there’s no difference when it came to applying generative AI ai functionality to legal research when you lost when you launched CoCounsel on the CMS March 1 2023. Greg Lambert 10:40 Yeah, I just wanted to follow up on that, because, you know, this was early 2023. Pablo Arredondo 11:34 Right.
At the state level, California has banned law enforcement from installing, activating, or using biometric surveillance with body cameras until 2023. Vermont and Virginia have banned law enforcement from using facial recognition technology pending further legislative action. See Vance v. Amazon.com Inc. , Compare, Vance v.
These federal authorities operate alongside statelaws and regulations, which are administered by state and local authorities and which include consumer welfare statutes and analogs to federal UDAP laws that also could apply to GenAI tools. Laws still apply when a customer is talking to a chatbot.
Most of its provisions are operative on July 1, 2023, while some provisions take effect later. Bottom Line : Businesses that operate in Connecticut or target Connecticut residents will need to apply slightly different analysis than previous statelaws to determine if they are subject to the CTPA. CTPA § 12(a)(6).
Marlene Gebauer 1:34 Yeah, and this there’s no difference when it came to applying generative AI ai functionality to legal research when you lost when you launched CoCounsel on the CMS March 1 2023. Greg Lambert 10:40 Yeah, I just wanted to follow up on that, because, you know, this was early 2023. Pablo Arredondo 11:34 Right.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
So this post is 100% true, even if it might sound farcical. * * * This ruling is part of an ongoing multi-iteration tussle (in and out of court) over market share between two rival unions. Because of these deficiencies, the court says: “The copyright note is not a DMCA notice under § 512. Maritas, 2023 WL 2726030 (E.D.
These range from employment and family law to personal injury and criminal law. Statelaws may resemble one another in some situations, but they may vary greatly in others. We added numerous surveys to this resource during the course of 2023. per hour, but some states require employers to pay a higher minimum wage.
A flurry of court rulings in April 2023 has left the future of the abortion pill mifepristone in question. Supreme Court decision on April 21 allows the drug to remain accessible without additional restrictions as the merits of the case are weighed in lower court proceedings. For now, a U.S.
The court accepts that the employer believed the works were created within the scope of employment, so the associated takedown notice wasn’t sent in bad faith. By design, it seeks to push questions over ownership to court, rather than have the intermediary service try to resolve those question. Shande will get his day in court.
A: because they spend so much time in court proceedings). Protip: if you want to win in court, don’t self-describe as an “appropriation artist”). The court treats Ripps’ collection as competing against and putting downward price pressure on the original NFTs. Q: why are the apes so bored?
The court brushes aside of all of Source Capital’s claims. Barrett Financial Group, LLC , 2023 WL 7552330 (D. 14, 2023) BONUS: Some other 2023 Quick Links About 512 * Cook v. Maximus International Specialists, 2023 WL 2603756 (S.D. Court still grants a TRO anyway…] * DP Creations LLC v.
However, FOSTA was not designed as an anti-CSAM law, so the plaintiffs’ claims don’t really fit the legal doctrine. In 2021, the court dismissed the non-FOSTA claims but did not dismiss the FOSTA claim. Reddit cert petition was pending before the Supreme Court. 2023 WL 8568911 (N.D. 2023 WL 8126845 (C.D.
” My post tried to translate this statement: Underneath this anodyne conclusion, the court is impliedly making two key points: (1) users’ activities do not contribute to evaluating the defendant’s 1591 exposure, and (2) the applicable scienter to get around 230 is 1591’s “actual knowledge” requirement. 2023 WL 3220913 (9th Cir.
The court treats this as a surprisingly easy Section 230 case and dismisses the case. Twitter , the court disagrees: Unlike in Lemmon and Roommates.com , the harm Plaintiffs allege here doesn’t flow from a design defect. ” The plaintiffs also sued Google and Apple for carrying Snap in their app stores. Next stop: the 9th Circuit.
In response to a facial constitutional challenge to FOSTA, the DC Circuit upheld the law after making several narrowing constructions. The remaining ambiguity over its scope chills and inhibits socially beneficial and completely legal behavior, but the law doesn’t help reduce illegal behavior. Taamneh case. Reddit, Inc. ,
The court holds that Section 230 applies to the claims. ” The court responds that “Grindr’s match function relies on and publishes a user’s profile and geolocation data, which is third-party content generated by the user.” The court rejects Doe’s attempted Lemmon v. ICS Provider. Publisher/Speaker Claims.
The court summarizes the facts: The two videos at issue comprise excerpts from Lakeway City Council meetings and a presentation Kilgore gave as mayor to Lakeway residents, sitting at a desk in front of United States and Texas flags. Both cases included a 512(f) claim, and both 512(f) claims survive the preliminary dismissal efforts.
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey , Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v.
To the extent that courts have acknowledged this issue, they have presumed that everyone knew Backpage was providing illegal services to sex traffickers. So for purposes of a motion to dismiss, courts can simply assume the upstream violations. Add Section 230 into the mix and tertiary liability looks even weirder.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content