2023 Court Intellectual Property 
Brett Trout
MARCH 11, 2025
Brett Trout Nikes reputation as an industry leader in athletic footwear is built on a foundation of innovation and aggressive protection of its intellectual property. Nikes History of Defending Its Patents Nike is no stranger to intellectual property lawsuits. The three Nike patents in question include: U.S.
Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog
MAY 4, 2023
The evolution of generative AI (artificial intelligence) has captured the attention of many Americans during the first few months of 2023. Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Debevoise Data Blog
FEBRUARY 14, 2025
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
Eric Goldman
JANUARY 18, 2024
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
Debevoise Data Blog
JANUARY 13, 2025
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights.
The North Carolina Journey of Law and Technology
FEBRUARY 1, 2024
However, independent designers are accusing Shein of something much more sinister: systematic and rampant intellectual property theft amounting to racketeering. The motion also urges the court to dismiss Baron’s copyright infringement claim because “his alleged artwork is not protectable under copyright law.” What’s Next?
Eric Goldman
MARCH 9, 2023
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” This paper explains the scheme, how it bypasses standard legal safeguards, how it’s affected hundreds of thousands of defendants, and how it may have cost the federal courts a quarter-billion dollars.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
90 
Let's personalize your content