This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Our top-eleven European dataprotection developments for the end of 2024 are: EU Cyber Resilience Act: The Council of the European Union approved the Cyber Resilience Act , introducing cybersecurity requirements for digital products sold in the EU. The UK Upper Tribunal did not consider the provisions under the UK GDPR.
International data transfers in GDPR compliance are complex, as data are transferred to third countries outside the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area (EEA). Suppose you are interested in personal dataprotection issues. What should the DTIA note for transferring personal data from the EU to Ukraine?
There were a few European dataprotection developments in February that companies may want to have on their radar. In Ireland, the DPA’s 2020 Annual Report revealed that the regulator considerably expanded its cookies investigations last year and has confirmed that cookies compliance is an enforcement priority for 2021.
The key development from April must be the European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) approving the draft UK adequacy decisions from the European Commission (the “Commission”). Companies will be relieved that they are one step closer towards maintaining the seamless flow of data between the EU and the UK.
million for vendor oversight failings, unlawful cross-border transfers What happened : The AEPD, the Spanish dataprotection authority (“DPA”), fined Vodafone Spain €8.15 4 million was for allegedly deficient oversight of Vodafone’s data processors. In December 2020, the Regional Court of Bonn held that, when reducing a €9.6
As covered in our Annual Review , 2020 was a blockbuster year for European dataprotection. If January is anything to go by, 2021 will be the same. The guidelines will be a new “go to” resource for those preparing for, and responding to, data breaches. Deliveroo algorithm ruled discriminatory by Italian court.
Here are our highlights: European Commission adopts new Standard Contractual Clauses What happened : As reported in our blog post , the European Commission adopted its new Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) for the cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to “third countries”.
million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic dataprotection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service.
Subject access requests : The possibility that companies responding to data subject access requests from individuals will have to provide copies of entire documents containing their personal data, rather than only extracts. The court concluded that the legitimate interest could have been furthered through less intrusive means.
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from August are: Uber fined for personal data transfer: The Dutch DataProtection Authority fined Uber €290 million for the unlawful transfer of European drivers’ personal data to the U.S., without sufficient safeguards.
We also saw developments in the courts on when companies will be liable to pay individuals damages for GDPR violations and the German anti-trust regulator using its new enforcement powers. This follows a February 2021 reference by the German courts to the CJEU on whether the GDPR imposes a materiality threshold for damages claims.
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. million against Marriott for its 2018 data breach When you dig deeper though, two key points emerge.
UK DPA launches data transfer consultation What happened : The ICO launched a consultation covering its international data transfer guidance, draft transfer risk assessment tool (“TRA”) and draft international data transfer agreement (“ IDTA ”). These developments, and more, covered below.
The big news this November was the European DataProtection Board (the “EDPB”) issuing its highly anticipated post- Schrems II data transfer guidance, followed just a day later by the European Commission’s draft updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) (see our blog post here ). Bonn Regional Court slashes Telco’s €9.55
Our top five European dataprotection developments from June are: Non-material damage under GDPR: The CJEU clarified the scope of compensation for non-material damage in the context of identity theft and data subjects’ fear that their personal data had been exposed. These developments, and more, are covered below.
The AEPD held that a DPO cannot hold a position that leads them to determine the purposes and means of data processing. These developments, and more, covered below.
As we covered here , last October, the CNIL fined Clearview AI €20 million for various dataprotection violations, including “intrusive and massive” data processing without consent or a valid legitimate interest. 82 (see our May 2021 , August 2021 , and October 2022 blog posts for previous developments).
Dataprotection & AI: In particular: (i) the French CNIL published its first set of guidance on GDPR compliance when developing AI tools; and (ii) the UK ICO issued a preliminary enforcement notice against Snap over its AI chatbot, alleging that Snap had not adequately assessed the privacy risks posed to child users of the tool.
Key takeaways from March include: CNIL data security practice guide: The French DPA published an update of its data security practice guide for dataprotection officers, chief information security officers, computer scientists and legal experts. These developments, and more, are covered below.
The Task Force was convened in September 2021 following hundreds of cookie banner-related complaints from the European Center for Digital Rights. EDPB’s cookie banner task force report highlights user-friendly design choices What happened : In January 2023, the EDPB adopted a final report on the Cookie Banner Task Force’s work.
Therefore, a logical question arises: what should an employer know about the use of personnel monitoring tools in order not to violate the requirements of personal dataprotection legislation? Justifying the need for monitoring The General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR) does not prohibit surveillance of employees in the workplace.
With the goal of simplifying and standardizing those business dealings, the non-profit organization oneNDA developed an open-source NDA that, since its launch in 2021, has been adopted by more than 1,000 companies, including American Express, Google, Novartis and Panasonic. The formally launched version one in August 2021.
HealthCareInfoSecurity.com reported that “A user of the now-shuttered BreachForums in April 2021 posted a data set of 533 million Facebook profiles, including mobile numbers, email addresses and names scraped from the site in 2018 and 2019.” Facebook reported revenue of $23 billion in 2022 and $39 billion in 2021.
2022 was another busy year in privacy and dataprotection. Regulations surrounding privacy and data continue to develop at a rapid pace. Andreas Splittgerber , Munich – “2023 will be a landmark year for AI regulations in Europe. Sven Schonhofen , Munich – “Cookie compliance will continue to be an enforcement trend.
This interest was generated among other sources by numerous complaints filed by NOYB—European Center for Digital Rights in the last year with dataprotection authorities, and has resulted in guidance and several decisions issued by regulators in recent months (e.g. in Austria, Belgium and France).
Entities transferring personal data outside the European Economic Area on the basis of standard contractual clauses that are no longer in force (where the transfer began before 27 September 2021) should conclude agreements based on new clauses by 27 December 2022.
In the wake of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision in Schrems II (covered here and here ) and Brexit, the EU and UK respectively updated and issued new cross-border transfer clauses. What happened? For many businesses, implementing the new SCCs and IDTA or Addendum at the same time will be most efficient.
On 1 March 2021, Federal Law No. 519-FZ on Amendments to the Federal Law on Personal Data dated 30 December 2020 (the “Law”) came into force. This is additional to general data processing consent, which is still required under pre-existing dataprotection law. Transfer of Publicly Disclosed Personal Data.
On 19 January 2021, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (the “ICO”) published its September 2020 letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) analysing the GDPR’s impact on UK-based SEC-regulated firms’ (“SEC–Regulated UK Firms”) ability to comply with SEC data requests. What was the issue? What is next?
What’s the issue: Comedian Kunal Kamra has sought a stay on the amendments at the Bombay High Court arguing that they’re arbitrary, unconstitutional, and place unreasonable restrictions on free speech. The Court has asked the government to file a complete response to Kamra’s petition including the question on competence.
With the goal of simplifying and standardizing those business dealings, the non-profit organization oneNDA developed an open-source NDA that, since its launch in 2021, has been adopted by more than 1,000 companies, including American Express, Google, Novartis and Panasonic. The formally launched version one in August 2021.
On March 11, 2021, the Amsterdam District Court found in favor of Uber in both suits ( see here and here ), holding that Article 22 did not apply because the decisions reached by these systems did not have “legal or similarly significant effects.”
Digital Doorbells: If any more evidence is needed that facial recognition technology has hit the mainstream, consider CNET’s review of the best facial recognition security cameras of 2021. What Kind of Data Do Facial Recognition Laws Cover? C20-1084JLR, 2021 WL 1401633, at *2 (W.D. C20-1082JLR, 2021 WL 1401634, at *5 (W.D.
Companies will only be able to enter into new agreements containing the old SCCs until 26 September 2021, and all contracts using the old SCCs concluded before then will need the new SCCs incorporated by 27 December 2022. Companies therefore need to decide when, and how, they will roll out the new SCCs. What do you need to do?
Further, in a case that we have covered previously involving a supermarket using video surveillance with facial recognition capabilities, the Spanish dataprotection authority (the “AEDP”) fined grocer Mercadona for violating numerous provisions of the EU’s General DataProtection Regulation.
The 2021 training cut-off for GPT large language models should be taken into account. I address that by using techniques like specifying that a person be an expert in the principles and approaches set out in the works of someone whose works are before 2021. In the case of ChatGPT, how do we deal with the current 2021 training cut-off?
The 2021 training cut-off for GPT large language models should be taken into account. I address that by using techniques like specifying that a person be an expert in the principles and approaches set out in the works of someone whose works are before 2021. In the case of ChatGPT, how do we deal with the current 2021 training cut-off?
Notably, the post that captured the most eyes was about New York becoming the first state to mandate CLE in cybersecurity, privacy and dataprotection. The second most popular post was a test of the BriefCatch legal editing software using the leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v.
It has been well-publicized that the Irish DataProtection Commission (“DPC”) has imposed a record €1.2 billion fine and corrective measures under the GDPR against Meta Ireland (“Meta”) in a long-running dispute relating to cross-border data transfers and the EU standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”). Other organizations (i.e.,
Blockbuster with the North Carolina Supreme Court decision in Canteen v. That left the majority’s discussion on the constitutionality of content moderation, which provides a modern Supreme Court take regarding the tsunami of censorship laws heading for the Supreme Court. I replaced Harris v. The Harris v.
According to the Future Ready Lawyer 2021 report , 84% of legal departments have increased their technology budgets in the last year. Improved DataProtection: Law firms are increasingly concerned about data security since technology is used more frequently.
The FTC alleged violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) Rule and Section 5 of the FTC Act, based on the company’s collection and retention of personal information from children without proper notice and consent. The UK DataProtection Act of 2018 has a similar provision. Quick Fitting, Inc.
In particular: in what circumstances, if any, would regulators or courts find that a flawed machine learning or AI model must be scrapped entirely? On January 11, 2021, the FTC adopted the mothball approach , entering into a settlement requiring Everalbum, Inc. A hot-off-the-press decision from the U.S.
According to the Future Ready Lawyer 2021 report , 84% of legal departments have increased their technology budgets in the last year. Improved DataProtection: Law firms are increasingly concerned about data security since technology is used more frequently.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content