2020 Failure-to-appear Hearing 
Attorney at Work
OCTOBER 29, 2021
If you or members of your team have IoT-connected devices at home like Amazon’s Alexa or a Nest security camera, you need to be wary of what work-related information those devices might see or hear during the day. But danger lurks behind certain tech when working from home. SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES. Here are some of my top scares.
Attorney at Work
JUNE 6, 2022
And law firms that resist the impetus for change will risk failure. Businesses around the world continue to feel the pandemic’s impact in countless ways. Similarly, many private clients struggle to overcome hurdles related to limited access to technology or lack of funds. Times of crisis and uncertainty always present opportunity.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Debevoise Data Blog
APRIL 14, 2021
The charges against First American Title Insurance Company are pending with an August 16 hearing date , and last month, the DFS reached its first full cybersecurity resolution with Residential Mortgage Services. This likely resulted in unauthorized access to certain customers’ nonpublic information.
Debevoise Data Blog
MARCH 7, 2021
That hearing is scheduled for April 5. million penalty for several violations including: Failure to investigate whether an attacker, who compromised a single email mailbox, accessed private data of individuals. Failure to satisfy various state breach notification obligations. Failure to notify the DFS of the incident.
Eric Goldman
MARCH 29, 2023
Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Mitrakos, 22-CCB-0035 , February 15, 2023, and Oppenheimer v. Prutton, 22-CCB-0045 , February 28, 2023. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. Let’s take a look.
Legal Tech Monitor
OCTOBER 27, 2023
2d 531 (1988) – finding that a lawyer’s failure to report another lawyer’s conversion of settlement proceeds violated the duty to report specified attorney misconduct; In re Richard A. He was a gentleman when he appeared before the court,” Grogan said. “He Working with him has been for me a true joy,” ARDC Chair Timothy Bertschy said.
Eric Goldman
JUNE 7, 2023
” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
122 
Let's personalize your content