This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On 1 March 2021, FederalLaw No. 519-FZ on Amendments to the FederalLaw on Personal Data dated 30 December 2020 (the “Law”) came into force. This is additional to general data processing consent, which is still required under pre-existing dataprotectionlaw.
HIPAA : The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federallaw that requires healthcare providers and “ business associates ” to protectprotected health information (PHI) from inadvertent disclosure. Check out our blog post on understanding HIPAA compliance for more information.
In this part, we assess where the law seems to be heading and offer some practical risk reduction strategies. Federal and State Legislation There is currently no federallaw that specifically regulates biometric privacy. No comprehensive and preemptive federallaw seems likely to pass anytime soon.
2020) (denying motions to dismiss and to strike class allegations against manufacturer of biometric timeclocks where plaintiff-employees did not receive notice or give consent to manufacturer). 1:20-CV-1084-JES-JEH, 2020 WL 5118035 (C.D. 19 CV 04722, 2020 WL 2513099 (N.D. May 15, 2020). See, e.g., Figueroa v. 454 F.Supp.3d
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content