This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Our top-eleven European dataprotection developments for the end of 2024 are: EU Cyber Resilience Act: The Council of the European Union approved the Cyber Resilience Act , introducing cybersecurity requirements for digital products sold in the EU. The UK Upper Tribunal did not consider the provisions under the UK GDPR.
They are responsible for overseeing an organizations dataprotection measures, risk management strategies, overall security infrastructure, among other critical responsibilities. District Court for the Southern District of New York suggests that CISOs might be outside of point-blank range.
International data transfers in GDPR compliance are complex, as data are transferred to third countries outside the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area (EEA). Suppose you are interested in personal dataprotection issues. What should the DTIA note for transferring personal data from the EU to Ukraine?
state to mandate that attorneys take continuing legal education courses in cybersecurity, privacy and dataprotection. New York has become the first U.S. Related: 40 States Have Adopted the Duty of Technology Competence. The order creates two types of cybersecurity training, one focused on ethics and the other on practice.
Recently, the Cologne District Court ruled that a German mobile operator’s use of Google Analytics violated the GDPR’s requirements for international data transfers. The Cologne District Court ruling only applies to the defendant in the case, Telekom Deutschland GmbH.
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. Second , enforcement goes far beyond data breaches and the GDPR. million and £99.2
The big news this November was the European DataProtection Board (the “EDPB”) issuing its highly anticipated post- Schrems II data transfer guidance, followed just a day later by the European Commission’s draft updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) (see our blog post here ). Bonn Regional Court slashes Telco’s €9.55
ICO targets the data broking industry : On 27 October, the ICO demanded that Experian make sweeping changes to dataprotection practices within its direct marketing business within three months or face further enforcement action. We will continue to report on developments as Experian’s appeal progresses.
There were a few European dataprotection developments in February that companies may want to have on their radar. What happened: CNIL has reminded businesses to audit their use of cookies and tracking technologies, ahead of the regulator’s October 2020 guidance coming into force at the end of March.
million for vendor oversight failings, unlawful cross-border transfers What happened : The AEPD, the Spanish dataprotection authority (“DPA”), fined Vodafone Spain €8.15 4 million was for allegedly deficient oversight of Vodafone’s data processors. Here are our highlights of what you need to know.
million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic dataprotection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service.
Key takeaways this April include: UK children’s dataprotection focus continues: Businesses may wish to review policies and procedures for dealing with children’s data in light of recent UK ICO fines and guidance, especially to ensure that terms of use are adequately enforced. 22, as set out by the court.
As covered in our Annual Review , 2020 was a blockbuster year for European dataprotection. This was bolstered by the ICO’s announcement that it is resuming investigations into real time bidding and the adtech industry that were paused in May 2020 due to COVID-19. EDPB publishes new data breach notification guidance.
The key development from April must be the European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) approving the draft UK adequacy decisions from the European Commission (the “Commission”). Companies will be relieved that they are one step closer towards maintaining the seamless flow of data between the EU and the UK.
EDPB “Consent or pay” models: Businesses operating large online platforms should consider the European DataProtection Board’s recent opinion indicating that “consent or pay” models are unlikely to be GDPR-compliant.
Here are our highlights: European Commission adopts new Standard Contractual Clauses What happened : As reported in our blog post , the European Commission adopted its new Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) for the cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to “third countries”.
UK tribunal limits ICO enforcement order but partially upholds lawful basis objection What happened : A tribunal rejected certain aspects of the UK ICO’s October 2020 enforcement notice against Experian, a credit reference agency that holds and processes data relating to essentially the whole of the UK’s adult population.
As we covered here , last October, the CNIL fined Clearview AI €20 million for various dataprotection violations, including “intrusive and massive” data processing without consent or a valid legitimate interest. The amount of compensation should be assessed by Member State courts under their domestic rules.
Brazil’s Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (or LGPD), similar to GDPR, CCPA and PIPEDA, regulates personal dataprotection. If the company does not process personal data in Brazil but still processes data to offer or supply goods or services to Brazil, the LGPD also applies in this case.
We also saw developments in the courts on when companies will be liable to pay individuals damages for GDPR violations and the German anti-trust regulator using its new enforcement powers. These decisions follow the CNIL’s October 2020 updated cookies guidelines (see our blog post ).
. : Business may want to revisit their cross-border data transfer arrangements following the new adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, assess whether they are eligible to self-certify and, if they are, whether it makes sense to. Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”). Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”).
Background The RAD came into force on December 24, 2020 with the objective of introducing a common framework and approach to collective actions across the EU. An action can be brought by several qualified entities from different member states in order to protect the collective interests of consumers in different member states.
Businesses operating in France should take these new blockbuster fines as another reminder of the importance of dataprotection frameworks and policies. In 2019 and 2020, the CNIL’s inspectors performed online checks of google.fr This fine was upheld on appeal in June 2020 (see our comments on the decision). and amazon.fr
On 19 January 2021, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (the “ICO”) published its September 2020 letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) analysing the GDPR’s impact on UK-based SEC-regulated firms’ (“SEC–Regulated UK Firms”) ability to comply with SEC data requests. What was the issue? What did the ICO find?
This interest was generated among other sources by numerous complaints filed by NOYB—European Center for Digital Rights in the last year with dataprotection authorities, and has resulted in guidance and several decisions issued by regulators in recent months (e.g. in Austria, Belgium and France).
519-FZ on Amendments to the Federal Law on Personal Data dated 30 December 2020 (the “Law”) came into force. This is additional to general data processing consent, which is still required under pre-existing dataprotection law. 3] To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here. [1] Special Consent.
Fast forward to the last month, the Delhi High Court used the long arm of the PMLA to classify PayPal as a ‘reporting entity’ under the PMLA. The Court rejected this premise. Main Course : Deep dive stories on card network portability, and impact of the dataprotection bill on fintechs. The data law is nearly here!
On March 11, 2021, the Amsterdam District Court found in favor of Uber in both suits ( see here and here ), holding that Article 22 did not apply because the decisions reached by these systems did not have “legal or similarly significant effects.”
The TDPA provides for a private right of action for violation of the prohibition to sell, lease, or disclose data. Compensatory damages or damages between $200 and $1,000 are authorized for each unlawful sale, as are reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs. 1:20-CV-1084-JES-JEH, 2020 WL 5118035 (C.D. See, e.g., Figueroa v.
This is because the obligations and prohibitions imposed on gatekeepers will either directly or indirectly vest other groups with rights they can pursue before national courts. The DMA vests these entities with certain rights, directly or indirectly, which they can enforce before national courts (Art. DMA recital 12). 5, 6 and 7 DMA.
Since these models generally evolve, regulators and courts might argue that—in the event of a performance issue or other regulatory concern—the model’s earlier outputs are important to understanding its later performance.
Among other proposed federal legislation, the National Biometric Information Privacy Act of 2020 died in Congress last year. Given that this provision of BIPA is currently being tested in the courts, this is also an important area for lawyers to monitor going forward.
Over 18 years of its existence, Google Analytics, and other Google services have become indispensable data processing tools for business owners and various organizations, such as educational institutions, healthcare, and sometimes even government agencies. It happened a few years ago. Presidential Executive Order No. 12.333 (E.O.
Notably, the post that captured the most eyes was about New York becoming the first state to mandate CLE in cybersecurity, privacy and dataprotection. The second most popular post was a test of the BriefCatch legal editing software using the leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v.
It has been well-publicized that the Irish DataProtection Commission (“DPC”) has imposed a record €1.2 billion fine and corrective measures under the GDPR against Meta Ireland (“Meta”) in a long-running dispute relating to cross-border data transfers and the EU standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”).
In this Data Blog post, we discuss recent enforcement actions and regulatory requirements for getting rid of old data and offer six tips for complying with these developing obligations. The UK DataProtection Act of 2018 has a similar provision. See Wai Feng Trading Co. Quick Fitting, Inc. 2019 WL 118412 (D. Wetzel (W.D.
Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”). The decision enables businesses in Europe to transfer personal data to DPF-certified U.S. businesses without having to implement additional dataprotection safeguards. Data subjects may lodge complaints through both U.S.- The DPF is the third U.S. or EU-based recourse mechanisms.
The European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) recently published new guidance on how companies can validly transfer EU personal data to the many countries that have not been deemed by the EU Commission to generally provide an adequate level of dataprotection – most notably the U.S. (so
The previous EU-US Privacy Shield was invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union in 2020 due to the lack of protection of EU personal data. The European DataProtection Board will provide its non-binding opinion on the draft adequacy decision. What are the next steps?
Data Privacy Framework (Framework) on July 10, 2023. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had previously invalidated both the U.S.-EU EU Privacy Shield in 2020 after challenges by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems (CJEU decisions known as Schrems I and Schrems II , respectively).
Jürgen Kühling is also a member of the German Monopolies Commission since July 1, 2016 and elected chairman since September 2020. Professor Kühling has been a member of the monopolies commission since July 1, 2016 and elected chairman since September 2020. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice.
Jürgen Kühling is also a member of the German Monopolies Commission since July 1, 2016 and elected chairman since September 2020. Professor Kühling has been a member of the monopolies commission since July 1, 2016 and elected chairman since September 2020. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice.
The GDPR permits data transfers from the European Economic Area (“EEA”) to a non-EEA jurisdiction if the EU Commission has decided that the recipient country meets certain criteria and thus ensures an adequate level of dataprotection or through other mechanisms such as EU Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”).
As a general rule, however, the FTC’s Division of Privacy and Identity Protection (the “DPIP”) initiates privacy and cybersecurity investigations via civil investigative demands (“CIDs”). A CID is a type of Commissioner-authorized subpoena, enforceable in court, that subjects the recipient to a number of formalized processes and timelines.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content