This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. Top Law Firm Invests $8.2M
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. She founded ClearBrief in 2020 to leverage AI to analyze documents and suggest relevant evidence and citations to streamline drafting. But you know, as litigators, we are in Word. It’s good to have you here.
Now, Casetext is formally launching that search tool under a new name, AllSearch , and with a focus on helping litigators search large sets of legal documents, including for e-discovery or to search internal databases and repositories, such as brief banks, litigation records, deposition transcripts, and expert reports.
Two litigation-focused Canadian legal technology companies, CiteRight and Jurisage , have merged, combining CiteRight’s litigation drafting program with Jurisage’s AI technology to create an integrated legal research and drafting solution.
Two litigation-focused Canadian legal technology companies, CiteRight and Jurisage , have merged, combining CiteRight’s litigation drafting program with Jurisage’s AI technology to create an integrated legal research and drafting solution.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
Provide a better client-centered service According to the 2020 Legal Trends Report , 78% of consumers say that lawyers should adopt pricing and payment models to make legal services more affordable. But can a law firm have client-centered pricing structures but still be cost-accessible and profitable? The best part?
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. Top Law Firm Invests $8.2M
When LexisNexis launched its Lexis+ premium legal research service in 2020, the service included Brief Analysis, its answer to a line of products pioneered by legal research company Casetext with its CARA brief analysis tool and followed by companies such as Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg Law.
Milestone caselaw in Illinois professional responsibility for lawyers After joining the ARDC as staff counsel, Larkin quickly assumed more responsibility, serving as Senior Counsel, Chief Counsel, Assistant Administrator, and then Deputy Administrator from 1988 until he was appointed Administrator in 2007. Indeed, Althea K.
This was a declaration for the CCB Case, dated 1/10/2023. We get a little more information from Douglas Prutton’s statement of facts, including how Oppenheimer finds his photographs and litigates, and also that the trial date was set for May 2022: “The federal case was scheduled for trial on May 16, 2022. 2020), cert.
In 2020, BuzzFeed “embedded” one of Hunley’s Instagram posts, featuring one of her photos of a Black Lives Matter protest, in its entirety (again, preserving her username, caption, and hashtags). As a result, a rich body of caselaw has developed distinguishing direct liability from secondary liability. 94-1476 , at 61 (1976).
When LexisNexis launched its Lexis+ premium legal research service in 2020, the service included Brief Analysis, its answer to a line of products pioneered by legal research company Casetext with its CARA brief analysis tool and followed by companies such as Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg Law.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. She founded ClearBrief in 2020 to leverage AI to analyze documents and suggest relevant evidence and citations to streamline drafting. But you know, as litigators, we are in Word. It’s good to have you here.
To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s caselaw concerning the fair-use doctrine. Before 2020, the Supreme Court decided only four fair use cases. In the first, Sony Corp.
Which is funny because I’ve been using neural networks in one form or another for 2020 ish years. And and thanks to you before, right before we got on, you showed me some additional examples and some use cases of what what you’re looking at. And you got things like automating litigation workflow, looking at the billing analytics.
Which is funny because I’ve been using neural networks in one form or another for 2020 ish years. And and thanks to you before, right before we got on, you showed me some additional examples and some use cases of what what you’re looking at. And you got things like automating litigation workflow, looking at the billing analytics.
Suzi also points out the prospective client does not care about caselaw – it’s important to focus on what they do care about, which is meeting their needs and building a relationship with them. 09:57 Suzi Hixon: Yeah, so the first 8 years out of law school I was working in a large law firm. I kind of hid it.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape.
It provides access to comprehensive primary and secondary law collections from more than 100 countries. The company told me last year that its collection of caselaw, legislation, journals and dockets serves over 2 million users across Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania, the Caribbean, and the Americas. caselaw and other materials.
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative? Anything else?
657 (2021) by SUSANNAH CAMIC TAHK , UW Law School We know that pro se litigants often lose. This Article calls those favorable precedents for pro se litigants “spillover precedents.” Spillover precedents are cases with redistributive downward ripple effects that subsequently benefit pro se litigants.
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape.
It provides access to comprehensive primary and secondary law collections from more than 100 countries. The company told me last year that its collection of caselaw, legislation, journals and dockets serves over 2 million users across Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania, the Caribbean, and the Americas. caselaw and other materials.
This is another election integrity case. A conspiracy theory alleged that he planned to throw the 2020 presidential election against Trump. In 2020, there would have been more preview information of the linked article. The plaintiff, Eric Coomer, worked for Dominion Voting. The court says Section 230 protects these tweets.
[Trump came close to repealing Section 230 in the 2020 lame-duck Congressional session (while he was also busy fomenting the J6 insurrection). The court responds: “Pointing to persuasive caselaw, Fenix contends that Plaintiff’s allegations far well short of what is needed to overcome CDA immunity.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content