This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you didn’t make it to the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, worry not, we’ve got you covered. So excited for our opening act of podcast interviews from the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco! — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) August 8, 2019. Tips for Construction Litigation. We hope you enjoy!
Set against the gorgeous coastline of Monterey, California at the beautiful Portola Hotel & Spa, the 2019 California Lawyers Association (CLA) Annual Meeting had a small town feel of something much bigger. — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) October 10, 2019. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Updates from CLA Leadership.
Held in Scottsdale, Arizona, the 2019 NALA Conference & Expo was perhaps their hottest conference to date with temperatures clocking in at 112 degrees. Also of notable mention was keynote speaker Judge William J. O’Neil who, since 2011, has been the presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court.
As a special offer, State Bar of Texas members who listen to the episode titled “ State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting 2019: Josh Team and the Adaptable Lawyer ” can get one hour of self-study MCLE credit. So much fun covering the 2019 State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) June 26, 2019.
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. The Toronto-based company recently closed a $2.1
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S.
It offers two products: Smart Search, through which users are able to find court dockets, rulings and filed documents, and Judge Analytics, where users can find information about judges’ caseloads and ruling tendencies, including grant rates for specific types of motions and anticipated timing to reach certain milestones.
This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. I previously summarized Judge Alsup’s modus operandi about motions to dismiss: Judge Alsup gives the benefit of the doubt to plaintiffs on motions to dismiss, only to hammer them on summary judgment if their evidence doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. So this case is now finally headed towards its always-inevitable date with the Ninth Circuit. * * * Last year, the judge gutted most of the case. and this lawsuit was filed in 2019, so the provisions couldn’t have been breached at the time of filing.
To the contrary, the company asserted that Agnello stole its idea after it gave him a demonstration of the software in 2019. Superior Court Judge Juliet J. Score one for ‘David’ in this David vs. Goliath battle” — a reference to a guest post about the litigation published on this blog by Mark Stodder , president of Xcential.
At issue are two versions of the TOS from 2016 and 2019. Amazon updated the TOS in 2019 to make explicit that arbitrability would be decided by an arbitrator, and it emailed the drivers the new TOS. ” Judge Graber dissents in part. see, e.g., its problems in the long-running Nicosia litigation). It did not do so.”
Many who create deepfakes just do it for fun, but manipulated videos and audio have made their way into litigation. Attorneys in a 2019 custody case in the U.K. If you haven't seen the eerie deepfake video that morphs Bill Hader's face as he imitates Tom Cruise and Seth Rogen, check it out.
General family law statistics Before we jump into litigation trends, let’s take a moment to look at how American family structures have changed. in 1990 to 36% by 2019. Self-representation in family law One of the most significant challenges facing the family law system today is the prevalence of self-represented litigants.
The 2019 Legaltech Product Innovation Competition is underway with 7 finalists having been named in early January. Erin Hichman , Senior Analyst with ALM Intelligence, is charged with organizing the 2019 innovation competition. how will the judging work? IL: Please walk us through the judging and evaluation process?
Frederick quit Tesla back in 2019 to start her own firm but quickly realized that she could do more with her 25 years of commercial contract drafting experience than simply serve her clients. “[O]ne Judge (aka Jeremy Richter). O]ne day I just started posting my advice on contracts,” Frederick says in a LinkedIn post on her profile.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). Founded: 5/10/2019. In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15.
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.”
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S.
million words spoken by lawyers, judges and litigants.” To partner with Slaughter and May, especially after taking part in their Collaborate Programme in 2019, is a real milestone for us.” That is where the idea of creating a tool trained with over 1.5 said Sophie Walker , founder and CEO of JUST: Access. “To
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Whether it is by accident or because of who he is, Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California has a way of finding himself at the center of the most important cases in the world of web scraping. There were a few steps in Judge Chen’s reasoning. He presided over the famous hiQ Labs v.
At its core, knowledge management is about finding lawyers who or documents or matters that can answer another lawyer’s questions about law, transactions, regulatory matters, judges, investors, clients, or industries. We wanted to make it easier to navigate this sea of information. The roll out was completed at the end of May.
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. 7, 2019) , noted Cardinal and agreed that third-party subpoenas must not burden responding parties. For instance in, In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig. ,
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. If so, as I predicted in 2019 , the UK Online Safety Act will accelerate the end of Web 2.0
Recommendations for maximizing those opportunities include training for judges and staff, increased use of technology to assist in civil case management and stronger enforcement of the rules. “While it has been over a decade since the rules were first implemented, there remains great opportunity for more consistent case management.”
It offers two products: Smart Search, through which users are able to find court dockets, rulings and filed documents, and Judge Analytics, where users can find information about judges’ caseloads and ruling tendencies, including grant rates for specific types of motions and anticipated timing to reach certain milestones.
It made me think of a new opportunity: maybe one day we will have a “Judge Judy” show for the CCB claims! In 2019, he had a simple website that included a “Where We Work” page. Screengrabs from October 29, 2019 from the Wayback Machine. We will have to wait and see! Oppenheimer v. Copyright Office on July 29, 2017.
It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law.
In past years, the judges narrowed the ballot to 25 semifinalists. This year, out of the 55 applications we received, the judges felt that so many deserved the opportunity to compete that we eliminated only 15 and we are putting the rest out for your votes. eSumry Elevator Pitch: We focus on litigation innovation.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. ” Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
This month serves as a reminder for lawyers, judges, other legal professionals, and parents alike to prioritize the well-being and emotional health of children during divorce proceedings. The parties—and attorneys if they are represented—agree to not litigate and instead use mediation and other negotiation tactics to settle their divorce.
Sinclair has served on the Commission since 2015 and was appointed Chair in 2019. The terms of Commissioners Judge Franklin U. He was appointed to the Commission on Professionalism in 2019 and as Vice-Chair in 2022. “I Hamilton and Eirene Salvi. These appointments are effective on January 1, 2024. Valderrama of the U.S.
The first of these, with the Courtroom Insight knowledge management product, will enable mutual customers to access Lexis+ and Lexis Context Analytics content about judges and expert witnesses from directly within the Courtroom Insight product, alongside the information that Courtroom Insight already provides. and the U.S.,
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. First, it robs the judiciary from independently interpreting the law because at step-two, Chevron requires federal judges to acquiesce to the reasonable policy interpretations of the federal agency. [10]
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
In exchange, judges in the First Circuit agreed to “liberally allow Land of Lincoln lawyers to appear remotely” (in accordance with Illinois Supreme Court Rules and Policies addressing remote proceedings) and Land of Lincoln attorneys agreed to appear remotely on behalf of clients.
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. Judge A likes it this way.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). Founded: 5/10/2019. In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Allan MacKenzie, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair. You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at TECHSHOW in the 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2020 Startup Alley. Roberta Tepper, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Ivan Hemmans, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair. You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at TECHSHOW in the 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2020 Startup Alley. Brooke Moore, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair.
And we have been sampling certain types of use cases, particularly around the search for relevance in litigation, and discovery. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor. And the chance of that happening is low.
Google was initially successful before the first instance judge in 2018. This was reversed by the Court of Appeal in 2019. This would have increased the costs of managing the claim, and would not have generated any immediate financial return for the litigation funders or any members of the represented class.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content