This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you didn’t make it to the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, worry not, we’ve got you covered. So excited for our opening act of podcast interviews from the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco! — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) August 8, 2019. Immigration Courts and Due Process. We hope you enjoy!
Set against the gorgeous coastline of Monterey, California at the beautiful Portola Hotel & Spa, the 2019 California Lawyers Association (CLA) Annual Meeting had a small town feel of something much bigger. — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) October 10, 2019. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Updates from CLA Leadership.
Sara Agate, MPH (@sara_agate) March 2, 2019. The following comprises our audio coverage of ABA TECHSHOW 2019 and a list of those who participated. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) February 27, 2019. ABA TECHSHOW 2019: Keynote Address. ABA TECHSHOW 2019: Tech Books For Lawyers. But so what?
Held in Scottsdale, Arizona, the 2019 NALA Conference & Expo was perhaps their hottest conference to date with temperatures clocking in at 112 degrees. Also of notable mention was keynote speaker Judge William J. O’Neil who, since 2011, has been the presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court.
As a special offer, State Bar of Texas members who listen to the episode titled “ State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting 2019: Josh Team and the Adaptable Lawyer ” can get one hour of self-study MCLE credit. So much fun covering the 2019 State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) June 26, 2019.
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. federal courts.
In an explosive exposé last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that 131 federal judges broke the law by hearing cases where they had a financial interest. To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases.
This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. I previously summarized Judge Alsup’s modus operandi about motions to dismiss: Judge Alsup gives the benefit of the doubt to plaintiffs on motions to dismiss, only to hammer them on summary judgment if their evidence doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. The latest ruling addresses YouTube’s motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, which the court grants with prejudice. So this case is now finally headed towards its always-inevitable date with the Ninth Circuit. * * * Last year, the judge gutted most of the case.
Launched in 2019, Quick Check was Westlaw’s answer to other brief-checking products on the market, all of which followed the 2016 introduction by Casetext of the original case-checking tool, CARA. The new feature flags cases that may run counter to an opponent’s arguments.
The balding, stern-faced judge stares down at me from his bench, framed by flags to either side of him, a judicial seal on the wall behind him. It is just the judge, the jury and me. May it please the court,” I begin. The judge nods, but it looks like a nod of impatience, not of listening. “Ok, we are on the record.
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
Superior Court during the 2019-2020 term. Aliza now writes and speaks regularly about judicial accountability, clerkships, and diversity in the courts. Superior Court during the 2019-2020 term because I aspired to be a homicide prosecutor in the D.C. After law school, Aliza clerked in D.C.
Furthermore, the court determined that Facebook’s survival clause did not explicitly cover scraping after the termination of Bright Data’s accounts. Secondly, the court viewed it as a defamation claim disguised as a contractual dispute, which violates the First Amendment. Can a breach of contract claim be equivalent to copyright?
The court agrees with Microsoft. ” If it matters, the concurring judge is a DeSantis appointee. 2019 WL 5595037 (S.D.N.Y. Among other defendants, he sued Microsoft for Bing search results linking to the episode. Microsoft defended on Section 230 grounds. Here’s an incomplete list: Maughan v. Google Technology, Inc.,
At issue are two versions of the TOS from 2016 and 2019. Amazon updated the TOS in 2019 to make explicit that arbitrability would be decided by an arbitrator, and it emailed the drivers the new TOS. Nor did the court have other evidence that might allow it to assess notice, such as a description of the email.
I’ve decided this one from 2 months ago is worth blogging, even at this date, given Judge Chhabria’s treatment of these claims. This ruling suggests that this judge views placing cookies like virtual dog-petting. 2019) Norton v. It feels like we are getting a pixel ruling every day. I’ve ignored most of them.
To the contrary, the company asserted that Agnello stole its idea after it gave him a demonstration of the software in 2019. Superior CourtJudge Juliet J. Related: Guest Post: David the Inventor vs. the Biglaw Goliath – What Drives A Goliath To Take On A David? McKenna disagreed. In a ruling issued Feb.
Judge Kozinski wrote the en banc majority opinion, and I’ve sensed judges have become less eager to cite Kozinski opinions given how his judicial career ended in a #MeToo canceling. Most judges have interpreted the Roommates.com exceptions narrowly. Many citations to Roommates.com result in defense wins. ” Uh oh.
So much had changed since the last in-person conference in San Diego during 2019. Innovation in the Courts with Judge Schlegel. The pandemic was a driver for change in justice systems around the globe, but one court’s innovative and inexpensive approach is worth a closer look.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Whether it is by accident or because of who he is, Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California has a way of finding himself at the center of the most important cases in the world of web scraping. The Delaware court stayed proceedings pending the California action. Meta sued in California.
The 2019 Legaltech Product Innovation Competition is underway with 7 finalists having been named in early January. Erin Hichman , Senior Analyst with ALM Intelligence, is charged with organizing the 2019 innovation competition. how will the judging work? IL: Please walk us through the judging and evaluation process?
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.”
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that the Illinois Supreme Court has appointed John K. Sinclair has served on the Commission since 2015 and was appointed Chair in 2019. Sinclair has served on the Commission since 2015 and was appointed Chair in 2019. Sinclair, Jr.,
But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Three courts of appeals have answered “no.”
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. Why Even Do This Project?
We’ve analyzed the latest family law statistics to uncover key trends in divorce outcomes, custody arrangements, and court decisions that impact your daily practice. Family courts are handling diverse caseloads. Of the 66 million cases handled by state courts each year, nearly 3.8 in 1990 to 36% by 2019.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). Founded: 5/10/2019. Founded: 11/1/2019. In December, we issued a call for entries. Advocat AI.
” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Access to Justice (ATJ Commission) recently issued a report documenting the cost and time savings of remote court appearances in southern Illinois’ First Judicial Circuit. Both agreed to provide the ATJ Commission with data on the impact of remote court appearances during the pilot program.
Enforcing court rules that require expedited actions can improve fairness, cost, and efficiency in the civil justice system while also relieving case backlogs exacerbated by the pandemic, according to new findings released by national experts today.
A judicial code of conduct is a set of ethical guidelines ensuring judges uphold integrity, impartiality, and professionalism. These bodies are often composed of judges and legal professionals who understand the nuances of judicial responsibilities and ethics. What is a judicial code of conduct?
The language model, developed in conjunction with leading academics with the help of Innovate UK , was created by transcribing hundreds of hours of court audio using the very latest in Natural Language Processing , ChatGPT and Machine Learning. million words spoken by lawyers, judges and litigants.”
Consistent with the CCB’s small claims court ethos, the case involved both a pro se claimant and respondent. Eric asked me: how would this have been different if the claimant had pursued the traditional route of suing in federal court? The CCB filing cost is about $300 less than federal court. We will have to wait and see!
And even though the creators of popular services know, and you know, and I know, and the Supreme Court knows , and every judge that decides every opinion on these issues knows, that no one is reading these documents, the legal system has collectively decided this system sufficient to bind everyone to a legal agreement. . OTO, L.L.C.
So, we had lawyers appearing as cats in court proceedings, legal commentators losing their gigs due to inappropriate behavior online, kids and pets making guest appearances in virtual hearings, and other misadventures. Remember how much you practiced your first moot court argument or your first “real court” argument?
The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal Resources About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. h) was added in 2019 and defines a flat fee as “a fee for specified legal services for which the client agrees to pay a fixed amount, regardless of the time or effort involved.” Table of contents What Are Lawyer Flat Fees?
The market is potentially huge, given that, in 2019, automotive OEM manufacturers paid $49.4 The software uses clustering to group cases that have similar characteristics — including characteristics specific to the vehicle as well as extraneous characteristics, such as the judge or jurisdiction. billion in just the U.S.
This month serves as a reminder for lawyers, judges, other legal professionals, and parents alike to prioritize the well-being and emotional health of children during divorce proceedings. Courts must also do their part by changing divorce procedures and proceedings to advance the same objectives, as must the lawyers representing parents.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that Chief Counsel Mark C. The Task Force falls under the Strategic Goal of Fair, Timely, and Efficient Courts. “AI Palmer previously served on an IJC Task Force that supported the development of the Illinois Court’s new website.
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.” 2019 is a real case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content