Attorney at Work

OCTOBER 29, 2021

But danger lurks behind certain tech when working from home. SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES. Working remotely, whether part-time or full-time, requires a variety of technology. And, to be sure, remote-work tech tools are loaded with treats that keep our businesses humming while we work from home. But the remote-work environment complicates things.

Legal tech 120

Legal tech Legal tech Lawyer e-records 120

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 21, 2021

In contrast, the Spanish DPA appears to have a preference for taking separate enforcement action: in 2020, it published 29 penalty notices against one company – Vodafone/Telefónica Móviles. DPAs face difficulties in making fines stick Regulators appeared to have a difficult time making penalties stick.

Data protection 52

Data protection Litigator Litigation Failure-to-appear 52

Debevoise Data Blog

OCTOBER 12, 2021

million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic data protection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service. These developments, and more, covered below. Standard Contractual Clauses).

Data protection 52

Data protection Failure-to-appear Compliance e-records 52

Legal Tech Monitor

JULY 27, 2023

Since this 2019 post, I think it is safe to say that the prevalence of social media evidence in civil and criminal proceedings has grown. Failure to do so may result in a range of unwanted consequences from the exclusion of evidence to disciplinary action. to maintain client confidences and protect sensitive client information.

Lawyer 52

Lawyer Defendant Failure-to-appear Court 52

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

NOVEMBER 23, 2023

12] Herzberg’s family sued Uber, the owner of the vehicle, but whether Uber or its programmers would have been found liable in civil court isn’t clear—the parties reached a confidential settlement. [13] 2] Ahead, a driver-operated car struck a pedestrian, throwing her into the Cruise’s path. If there is no driver, who is liable?

Lawsuit 52

Lawsuit Judge Court Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

JUNE 7, 2023

The court treats this as a surprisingly easy Section 230 case and dismisses the case. By definition, Snap’s failure to remove CSAM distributed on Snapchat by third parties, and Apple’s and Google’s choice to allow Snapchat to remain available for download in their online stores, involve “reviewing. Next stop: the 9th Circuit.

Failure-to-appear 118

Failure-to-appear Defendant Lawsuit Court 118

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 26, 2023

With regard to Plaintiffs’ failure to warn claims, Section 230 immunity does not apply since the conduct at issue was Defendants’ conduct and not the conduct of third parties. ” * Doe v. Grant, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 1327 (Az. Superior Ct. March 31, 2021). Puppies, 2020 Ariz. LEXIS 851 (Az. Superior Ct.

Defendant 98

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Lawsuit 98

Debevoise Data Blog

JULY 20, 2022

In 2019, a California federal court denied Aerojet’s motion to dismiss the claims and, in 2022, denied Aerojet’s motion for summary judgment, finding that partial disclosures would not relieve Aerojet of liability if it nonetheless failed to disclose its noncompliance with material regulatory provisions. On July 8, 2022, the U.S.

Failure-to-appear 40

Failure-to-appear Compliance Court Attorney 40

Eric Goldman

JUNE 9, 2024

The court responds: “Doe’s breeding ground theory essentially seeks to hold Meta liable for failing to remove traffickers’ grooming messages and posts advertising their victims for sex.” Finally: in passing, the court says “Her trafficker was convicted in a criminal trial and sentenced to 40 years in prison.”

Lawsuit 88

Lawsuit Criminal trial Court Defendant 88

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 18, 2025

The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content.

Lawsuit 64

Lawsuit Failure-to-appear Defendant Court 64

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 29, 2023

The court holds that Section 230 applies to the claims. ” The court responds that “Grindr’s match function relies on and publishes a user’s profile and geolocation data, which is third-party content generated by the user.” The court rejects Doe’s attempted Lemmon v. ICS Provider. Publisher/Speaker Claims.

Lawsuit 98

Lawsuit Court Defendant Failure-to-appear 98

Berkley Technology Law Journal

OCTOBER 3, 2023

In her new book, The Fight for Privacy , Danielle Keats Citron argues that failure to adequately protect digital privacy could have a chilling effect on the public’s ability to exercise their first amendment rights to free expression. Conference of Catholic Bishops. How did The Pillar obtain this sensitive information?

Failure-to-appear 130

Failure-to-appear Court Defendant Federal law 130

Eric Goldman

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

Having manufactured the requirement of that the claim must be based on “particular” content to trigger Section 230, the court says none of the claims do that. ” I’d love for the court to explain how blocking users from contacting each other on apps differs from “content moderation.”

Court 105

Court Lawsuit Judge Defendant 105

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey , Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v. Tam (2017) and Iancu v.

Court 106

Court Law Law Failure-to-appear 106

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 10, 2024

I’m still blogging Section 230 cases as I see them, even though these posts are likely to have only historical value. ] * * * The court summarizes the horrifying allegations: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (“Charles”) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. The court dismisses OnlyFans per Section 230.

Defendant 117

Defendant Lawsuit Failure-to-appear Court 117