2019 Case law Judge 
Above the Law - Technology
JUNE 15, 2023
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced case law library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. WellSettled.com Mines Cases for Established Principles.
LawSites
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Eric Goldman
DECEMBER 13, 2023
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it.
LawSites
MARCH 18, 2024
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. We all should have free, easy access to the law, and no one should gain competitive advantage from having privileged access to the law itself. Case law books waiting to be scanned.
Legal Tech Monitor
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.” 3d 1339 (11th Cir.
Eric Goldman
MARCH 29, 2023
It made me think of a new opportunity: maybe one day we will have a “Judge Judy” show for the CCB claims! In 2019, he had a simple website that included a “Where We Work” page. Screengrabs from October 29, 2019 from the Wayback Machine. 2019) (citing Campbell, 510 U.S. We will have to wait and see! Oppenheimer v.
Legal Tech Monitor
JUNE 15, 2023
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced case law library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. WellSettled.com Mines Cases for Established Principles.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
207 
Let's personalize your content