2019 Case law Hearing 
LawSites
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
Eric Goldman
JULY 18, 2023
If the contract limits any action that copyright law restricts, meaning reproduction, distribution, adaptation, or public performance or display of works within the scope of copyright, it is preempted. However, it was sometimes not as clear as the case law of other circuits. A third approach?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Eric Goldman
MARCH 29, 2023
Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination. 2019) (citing Campbell, 510 U.S. LLC, 922 F.3d
Eric Goldman
MAY 13, 2024
s Terms of Service (“ToS”) when it created a new account in 2019. But whatever the policy inclinations of judges and advocacy groups, the reality of the case law makes it difficult to distinguish between pro-social groups like CCDH, run-of-the-mill commercial entities, and even gray area or dark web-type scrapers.
Legal Tech Monitor
MAY 30, 2023
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.” 2019 is a real case.
LawSites
MARCH 18, 2024
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Case law books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape.
Legal Tech Monitor
AUGUST 3, 2023
Not only will it answer your questions easily and quickly, but, like a human friend, it may sometimes tell you what you want to hear, and sometimes it may share outright fabrications (called hallucinations). Upon double-checking, I found the case Varghese v. ChatGPT’s responses are very confident and persuasive. 3d 1339 (11th Cir.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
122 
Let's personalize your content