This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is why some Americans resort to tax advisors, attorneys, or other professionals to help them meet their obligations under tax laws. Even people who can afford it may want to know the basics about how the law works before diving into the details, or deciding whether they want professional help.
Law firm data security should be a top priority for any practice, and here’s why: Clients trust you with their most confidential information. Since clients entrust lawyers with so much of their sensitive data, law firms make prime targets for cybercrime. You don’t want your law firm to become part of that statistic.
As I reported here in November , the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has sued Xcential for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other causes of action. The cut-and-bite style has always been a challenge for federal drafters. This is Stodder’s perspective on the lawsuit. First, the context.
Federal administrative law impacts nearly every element of our lives. 837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. Part IV offers a concluding remark and suggests further reading on federal administrative law.
Even as the laws surrounding cannabis vary around the country, some states are going beyond this drug to explore changing regulations around psychedelic drugs. laws also less frequently mentioned MDMA, peyote/mescaline, ibogaine, LSD, and DMT/ayahuasca. At the federal levels, MDMA and LSD are schedule 1 substances. Proposed U.S.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Europe introduced a data protection law, which is the GDPR, in 2018 for businesses handling personal and private personal information. Though it concerns companies in Europe, it might affect a law firm in the United States. It is good to learn about GDPR and stay compliant.
330 (2018) that a “material risk of harm” can sometimes “satisfy the requirement of concreteness” as applying only to matters seeking injunctive relief. The authors would like to thank Debevoise law clerk Samuel Allaman and summer associates Kat McKay and John Juenemann for their contributions to this blog post. Robins , 578 U.
The BTLJ Podcast team sits down with ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Matt Cagle to discuss the use of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) by police departments and other law enforcement entities. Podcast Transcript: [Tiffaney] 0:12 You’re listening to the Berkeley Technology Law Journal Podcast. I’m Tiffaney Boyd.
ByteDance, a Chinese internet technology company, acquired TikTok (formerly known as Musical.ly, a lip-syncing app) in 2018. TikTok bans: A brief summary The United States has enacted several laws that either outright ban TikTok or possess the potential to do so. What is TikTok? TikTok is a highly popular social media platform.
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA), enacted in 1966, is the only Federallaw that regulates the treatment of animals in research facilities. Check out the law library for more animal testing information: Animal Experimentation: a Guide to the Issues , by Vaughan Monamy, Call number HV 4915.M65 7 USCS § 2149. Carswell Sol Blatt, Jr.
This article briefly addresses this problem, summarizes current local, state, and federallaws enacted or proposed to curtail it, and proposes two solutions for modern employers itching to implement AI-assisted employee management tools but dreading employment litigation. 13] Amazon is a prime example (no pun intended).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content