This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
The practice of e-discovery has always incorporated considerations of new and emerging technologies as well as related attorney competence. Industry standard-bearer Gartner’s 2018 CIO Survey indicated that just 1 percent of CIOs reported blockchain adoption and only 8 percent were in planning or experimentation phases.
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. 23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.”
Other uses in e-litigation include providing a particular content was live at a particular moment, and generating online evidence of brand usage for intellectual property cases, the latter being the main reason a big international fashion brand have trusted Stillio. These will come in handy in case of complaints or litigation.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). Given this paucity of U.S.
That doesn’t mean, however, that law firms and litigation support teams have been quick to embrace them. Artificial intelligence tools have become prevalent in legal practice, particularly in eDiscovery. Despite their benefits, many legal organizations have been hesitant to implement AI tools. AI Hesitation.
I wrote about platformization in legal tech as far back as my 2018 post, The 20 Most Important Legal Technology Developments of 2018 , where I cited CRM company Salesforce as the classic example, launching its AppExchange and opening its platform to third-party developers. In business in the U.K. Pricing Simplification.
Proof Technology , a company whose platform provides a marketplace for on-demand service of process and e-filing, has raised a $7 million Series A funding round led by Blue Heron Capital and The Legal Tech Fund, with participation by Clio Ventures and existing investors Crossbeam Venture Partners and Forward VC. Proof Raises $7M.
Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Traction: We have done a lot of work on customer discovery and gathered a great deal of positive feedback. Founded: 9/8/2018. Founded: 4/1/2021. Clearbrief.
DISCO Joins the LexFusion Go-to-Market Collective As Its E-Discovery Provider. The e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW), one of only a handful of publicly traded legal tech companies, has joined LexFusion , a go-to-market collective of legal technology companies, as its e-discovery provider, the two companies announced this morning.
6, 2018, the Article 29 Working Party (Working Party 29) published Working Paper 261 (WP 261), which provided guidance on the provisions of Article 49 of the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Also, WP 261 seems to directly consider the e-discovery context when relating Article 49 of the GDPR to Article 48.
The Tech Edge JD launched in 2017, inviting law school applicants to apply for a position in the inaugural 2018 incoming cohort. Mark Michels, is a lecturer in law, teaching leadership for lawyers, e-discovery, and patent litigation, at Santa Clara University School of Law. .
E-discovery solutions , a significant part of legal tech, were estimated to be a multi-billion-dollar industry. The global e-discovery market size was projected to reach $17.32 billion by 2023, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 10% from 2018.
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination.
Regulatory Requirements to Get Rid of Old Data Data-minimization laws generally provide that nonpublic data should be kept until it is no longer needed either for legitimate business purposes or legal reasons, such as a pending litigation or a regulatory requirement. The cover art used in this blog post was generated by DALL-E.
It describes its product as an “end-to-end legal operating platform” that can be used for full-service practice management, enterprise legal management, plaintiff practice management and claims litigation management. million in 2018 and $5 million in 2017. Who are those lawyers?
They began using tools like Google’s BERT AI as early as 2018 and included AI functionality in many of their products on the backend of the resources. And around 2018, we started using Burr, which was one of the first Large Language Models that Google put out at that time. R E I H L and don’t hesitate to reach out.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). Given this paucity of U.S.
Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Traction: We have done a lot of work on customer discovery and gathered a great deal of positive feedback. Founded: 9/8/2018. Founded: 4/1/2021. Clearbrief.
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
They began using tools like Google’s BERT AI as early as 2018 and included AI functionality in many of their products on the backend of the resources. And around 2018, we started using Burr, which was one of the first Large Language Models that Google put out at that time. R E I H L and don’t hesitate to reach out.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”
As a result, the rest of the copyright ecosystem has to live with the fallout from AWF’s seemingly reckless and irresponsible litigation strategy. See Ochoa, Dr. Seuss, the Juice and Fair Use Revisited , 59 IDEA 233 (2018).) Although Goldsmith’s lawyers pleaded the discovery rule ( id. Soc’y USA 546 (1998).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content