This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from February are: European Commission publishes guidelines on prohibited AI practices : The EU Commission has published non-binding guidance on the EU AI Acts prohibited use cases. Spanish Telecomm Provider Fined 1.2
Our top-eleven European dataprotection developments for the end of 2024 are: EU Cyber Resilience Act: The Council of the European Union approved the Cyber Resilience Act , introducing cybersecurity requirements for digital products sold in the EU. The UK Upper Tribunal did not consider the provisions under the UK GDPR.
Every day, more and more companies face the problem of personal dataprotection. As companies are increasingly scrutinised for proper dataprotection, it’s worth paying close attention to the latest best practices to avoid dealing with the potential negative consequences of a data breach.
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from August are: Uber fined for personal data transfer: The Dutch DataProtection Authority fined Uber €290 million for the unlawful transfer of European drivers’ personal data to the U.S., without sufficient safeguards.
UK DPA launches data transfer consultation What happened : The ICO launched a consultation covering its international data transfer guidance, draft transfer risk assessment tool (“TRA”) and draft international data transfer agreement (“ IDTA ”). These developments, and more, covered below.
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. million against Marriott for its 2018data breach When you dig deeper though, two key points emerge.
million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic dataprotection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service. These developments, and more, covered below.
EDPB “Consent or pay” models: Businesses operating large online platforms should consider the European DataProtection Board’s recent opinion indicating that “consent or pay” models are unlikely to be GDPR-compliant.
Key takeaways this April include: UK children’s dataprotection focus continues: Businesses may wish to review policies and procedures for dealing with children’s data in light of recent UK ICO fines and guidance, especially to ensure that terms of use are adequately enforced. 22, as set out by the court.
GDPR one-stop-shop: Businesses wishing to take advantage of the GDPR one-stop-shop system should take note of a new digest, published by the European DataProtection Board, which analyses the decisions made by so-called Lead Supervisory Authorities in this context.
Dataprotection & AI: In particular: (i) the French CNIL published its first set of guidance on GDPR compliance when developing AI tools; and (ii) the UK ICO issued a preliminary enforcement notice against Snap over its AI chatbot, alleging that Snap had not adequately assessed the privacy risks posed to child users of the tool.
Key takeaways from March include: CNIL data security practice guide: The French DPA published an update of its data security practice guide for dataprotection officers, chief information security officers, computer scientists and legal experts. 33(2) GDPR relating to the same personal data breach.
The ruling contains the largest data privacy fine to be issued in the European Union since the bloc’s General DataProtection Regulation, or GDPR, came into force in 2018 and follows more than a decade of court standoffs.
However, data controllers and processers should be aware that the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) can also carry out dawn raids as part of investigations into compliance with dataprotection laws. The ICO must obtain a court warrant to conduct a dawn raid. unlawfully obtaining personal data).
Companies must also foot the bill for consumer data requests authorized under privacy regulations unless the request is “excessive.” 23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.” 11 cv 4071 (N.D.
HealthCareInfoSecurity.com reported that “A user of the now-shuttered BreachForums in April 2021 posted a data set of 533 million Facebook profiles, including mobile numbers, email addresses and names scraped from the site in 2018 and 2019.” Facebook reported revenue of $23 billion in 2022 and $39 billion in 2021.
Although the letter was greeted by Acting SEC Chairman Roisman as confirmation that the “ UK GDPR does not impose legal barriers to the transfer of personal data […] directly to the SEC for regulatory or enforcement purposes ”, SEC–Regulated UK Firms may still need to scrutinise data requests and have procedures in place to ensure GDPR compliance.
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (Pub. 115-141 (2018), or the CLOUD Act, was enacted in the U.S. on March 23, 2018, in response to difficulties U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on the case in February 2018. Microsoft lost the case in 2014 , but won an appeal in 2016.
Overview In a much anticipated decision, the UK Supreme Court has unanimously decided that a mass claim brought against Google by Mr Richard Lloyd, on behalf of a class that could include as many as 4.4 million iPhone users (the “iPhone Users”), cannot proceed, as currently constituted, as a ‘representative action’ in the English courts.
Why is Data Compliance Important? Failure to adhere to the security framework regarding dataprotection can lead to high fines and even court cases. There is a good level of customer data compliance that prevents unauthorized access or alteration to sensitive information.
On August 18, 2023, the Fourth Circuit decertified approximately 20 million putative class action claims arising out of a 2018data breach involving Marriott Hotels. According to the Fourth Circuit, this “error affect[ed] the whole of the certification order.”
6, 2018, the Article 29 Working Party (Working Party 29) published Working Paper 261 (WP 261), which provided guidance on the provisions of Article 49 of the European Union’s (EU) General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR).
Entities transferring personal data outside the European Economic Area on the basis of standard contractual clauses that are no longer in force (where the transfer began before 27 September 2021) should conclude agreements based on new clauses by 27 December 2022.
In this blog post, we outline the current and forthcoming EU legislation on the international transfer of non-personal data. Some of this legislation has been enacted recently, and other legislation on this topic is making its way through the legislative process but has yet to be adopted. X (Recent Council versions remove this obligation.)
Instead of a separate regulator, the government is contemplating a body similar to the dataprotection board suggested under the latest version of the data bill. Meanwhile, courts continue to interpret. , emerging tech (read: we got to do something about AI), digital competition (whose pie is this issue anyway?),
Fast forward to the last month, the Delhi High Court used the long arm of the PMLA to classify PayPal as a ‘reporting entity’ under the PMLA. The Court rejected this premise. Main Course : Deep dive stories on card network portability, and impact of the dataprotection bill on fintechs. The data law is nearly here!
Since these models generally evolve, regulators and courts might argue that—in the event of a performance issue or other regulatory concern—the model’s earlier outputs are important to understanding its later performance.
billion by 2023, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 10% from 2018. Compliance Tools: Legal tech assists law firms in adhering to dataprotection regulations like GDPR and HIPAA. They offer tools for data retention policies, access controls, and audit trails, ensuring compliance and mitigating legal risks.
So what we know at the moment we see in the US courts, the discussion if Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp has to be broken up. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice. One idea is the idea of data portability. And that is the basic idea of data portability. This is the ultimate sanction.
So what we know at the moment we see in the US courts, the discussion if Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp has to be broken up. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice. One idea is the idea of data portability. And that is the basic idea of data portability. This is the ultimate sanction.
Notably, the post that captured the most eyes was about New York becoming the first state to mandate CLE in cybersecurity, privacy and dataprotection. The second most popular post was a test of the BriefCatch legal editing software using the leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v.
In particular: in what circumstances, if any, would regulators or courts find that a flawed machine learning or AI model must be scrapped entirely? According to the settlement, between July 2018 and April 2019, Everalbum represented to users that it would not apply facial recognition to users’ content unless a user affirmatively opted in.
Under this requirement, businesses need to establish time limits for data deletion and to institute a periodic review of the necessity for continued data retention. The UK DataProtection Act of 2018 has a similar provision. Individuals also have a right to obtain information about the storage periods. Wetzel (W.D.
National courts will have to determine whether a feeling of displeasure meets the threshold of non-material damage. What to do : Keep an eye out for the final decision by the court. Advocate General opinions are influential but not binding.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content