This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The archive is intended to preserve these older articles, which were written prior to the Court Technology and Trial Presentation blog, which I started writing in 2009. Although these articles are somewhat "dated," many of them are still surprisingly relevant. Things are different for writers now, in that you can click, and publish.
Today’s document deep dive focus is on the recent California Court of Appeals decision to remand Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC to the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and the Hon. The lawsuit, filed in August 2018,… Continue reading → The post Document Deep Dive: The Return of Wozniak v.
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
In 2018, two years after D. He also served on two Utah Supreme Court task forces that led to the creation of the Utah Sandbox. Gordon Smith became dean of the J. Now, Smith has announced he is stepping down as dean at the end of this semester, after having been the second-longest serving dean in the school’s history.
As a litigator in Los Angeles, Nicole Clark saw that state court data could be a secret weapon for winning, but she also saw how difficult it was for her and other lawyers to access that data. Eventually, Clark hopes to see the use of court analytics become the industry standard, commonplace among litigators and expected by clients. .
Skechers (2016) Nike took Skechers to court for allegedly infringing eight Nike patents, including patents covering the Flyknit technology. Puma (2018) Another legal battle over Flyknit-type shoe designs. The case was settled in 2022. The lawsuit was settled in 2021.
Reynen Court , the so-called app store for legal technology, has promoted two of its key executives to new roles. The news comes a week after Reynen Court launched a general solicitation stock offering in order to bring on individual lawyers and “legal technology enthusiasts” as investors in the company. .
On this episode of LawNext: An interview recorded live with Erika Harold , executive director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism , an organization charged with working to enhance civility and professionalism and to eliminate bias within the legal profession.
Law practice management company Clio has acquired the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules , Clio’s first acquisition since becoming the first law practice management company to achieve unicorn status earlier this year and its second acquisition ever. Syncing court dates to calendars in Microsoft Outlook and Google Calendar. “By
Trellis , a company that provides legal analytics and research for state trial court records, has expanded its coverage into another five states, bringing its total coverage to 21 states. Trellis has now added coverage for courts in Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Last year, it raised $14.1
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
Reynen Court , the so-called app store for legal technology, today launched a general solicitation stock offering in order to bring on individual lawyers and “legal technology enthusiasts” as investors in the company. . The offering, which is described at invest.reynencourt. million raised earlier this year.
After hearing this allegation at least twice, the Court instructed plaintiffs’ counsel to go present proof of such a bribe and to specifically subpoena the banks that were allegedly involved in laundering the bribe. This was, in a way, to “monopolize” the adult entertainment market. Case Citation : Dangaard v.
In April, Tesla will be back in court over allegations that the company’s autopilot driver-assist software is defective and led to a fatal 2018 car accident that took the life of a former Apple employee in California.
Quinn Yeargain Utahns in 2018 approved a slate of ballot measures that legalized medical cannabis, expanded Medicaid, and set up an independent redistricting process. All three reforms had been initiated by citizens, and put on the ballot after a painstaking petition-gathering campaign.
On March 7, 2024, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) rendered its judgment in an appeal against a decision of the EU General Court ( C-479/22P ). The CJEU overturned the decision of the General Court. The Court did not decide that the data were personal data simply because OLAF knew who the scientist was.
This news follows Clio’s July 28 announcement that it acquired CalendarRules, an automated court calendaring product. It is Clio’s third acquisition ever, including its 2018 , acquisition of Lexicata , the client relationship management platform that formed the basis of Clio Grow. . Note: I oversee the Startup Alley.].
Not according to a recent survey by the court reporting company Esquire Deposition Solutions , which found that 78% of attorneys plan to continue conducting up to half their depositions virtually in a post-pandemic world. The court reporter can mark and manage the exhibit. People and Process Meet Technology.
Originally a legal research company, Fastcase has diversified in recent years, launching its Full Court Press publishing arm and acquiring Docket Alarm and Law Street Media in 2018, NextChapter in 2019, and the technology and team of Judicata in 2020. Neither company is new to AI, he pointed out.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
“Along the way, she found that by innovating in the area of remote testimony she could help increase access to justice and empower court reporters,” the website says. She has two cofounders in the company: Scott Graff , a software engineer, and Dineen Squillante , a stenographer.
To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases. The data the Journal used was compiled by the Free Law Project , a non-profit that works to provide free and open public access to court data, opinions, filings and other information.
The court denied the motion. In our 2018 study, we found seven cases involving male victims. Spencer (proceeding pro se) filed a motion to dismiss on several grounds, including Section 230. ” Indeed, it does not. While this opinion isn’t a surprising outcome, it reinforces three points of note.
Back in 2018, something remarkable happened. court decisions freely available to the public in a standardized digital format. Green of the Massachusetts Court of Appeals. The 20 Most Important Legal Technology Developments of 2018. case law — some 6.4 million cases dating all the way back to 1658, a span of 360 years.
2] Even way back in 2018, LawGeex demonstrated the superior work of its technology as compared to humans, in issue-spotting clauses in NDAs. Sneed III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and then practiced law (primarily bankruptcy law) with Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco from 1986-1991.
Ever since its founding in 2018, Steno has been on a mission to disrupt depositions. It started as a court reporting agency that also offered non-recourse financing of deposition costs, and then in 2020 launched Steno Connect , its own web-based video conferencing technology specifically built for remote depositions and exhibit handling.
He also sees opportunities to use the tools to help pro se litigants and courts. Yeah, so it was November of 2018, if you can believe it. Jeff Pfeifer 1:43 Well, it seems ironic that we were talking about that in 2018. So that was a huge step in around 2018. So So Jeff, I looked it up?
At just over halfway through February, we’ve had twenty cases on our 2018 trial calendar, and nine have settled. Even the Court benefits when technology is properly utilized in trial, shortening the length of a matter significantly. Uber, Lyft and Taxi Cabs).
Employment Trends for Law Graduates In a joint study by the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) and the NALP Foundation, findings revealed that 97% of surveyed law graduates from the class of 2018 were employed. However, only 51% were working in law firms. 2 The ABA reported 7.6% In 2022, 84.6%
In 2018 I wrote my first post about vLex. The vLex product will retain the vLex brand in global markets and Fastcase will retain their suite of brands including Fastcase, Docket Alarm, Next Chapter and Full Court Press in the US. I wrote about vLex AI enabled Vincent innovation in 2018. The title was “ Can vLex Crack the U.S.
Guberman said that BriefCatch has tens of thousands of customers, including several Supreme Court justices, most of the federal circuit courts, large government agencies, and law firms of every size and specialty. Gorsuch, whom Slate had pronounced “ a terrible writer.”
In 2018, Jason Fyk sued Facebook for removing and blocking his content. My previous summary of this litigation campaign: His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. The Supreme Court denied cert. Having exhausted his arguments in court twice, he launched a third expedition against Section 230.
I’ve blogged many Ripoff Report cases over the years, but it’s been a while since my last one (looks like 2018 ?). He brought a state court class action lawsuit against Ripoff Report, alleging violations of CA B&P 17200 and the implied covenant of good faith. Ripoff Report removed the case to federal court.
While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.
Data Protection Authority powers: The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has ruled that Data Protection Authorities are not obliged to exercise corrective powers in the event of a breach. The German courts referred the interpretation of GDPR to the CJEU.
” In 2018, the state claimed Facebook violated the law, and Facebook stipulated to a $200k judgment. The superior court found that Facebook violated this law and awarded $35M in penalties and attorneys’ fees as well as an injunction. In December 2024, the appeals court affirmed everything.
As a litigator in Los Angeles, Nicole Clark saw that state court data could be a secret weapon for winning, but she also saw how difficult it was for her and other lawyers to access that data. Eventually, Clark hopes to see the use of court analytics become the industry standard, commonplace among litigators and expected by clients. .
However, although persuasive, the Guidelines are not authoritative and the EU AI Acts application is likely to be refined by its practical implementation and the courts in the future. What to do : Businesses who use or distribute AI may wish to consider these guidelines when reviewing their compliance with the EU AI Acts prohibitions.
The last time I wrote about BriefCatch , it was in 2018, when I put it and two other legal editing programs to the test of editing four opinions authored by Supreme Court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, pronounced by Slate a terrible writer.
While the statutory elements of a Section 1202(b) claim appear straightforward, certain courts considering claims involving CMI have added two hurdles for copyright plaintiffs: a “double scienter” requirement and an identicality requirement. 2018); Victor Elias Photography, LLC v. Double Scienter. Buzzfeed , 970 F.3d 2020); Stevens v.
The Illinois Supreme Court announced today that it has appointed Lea S. As Administrator of the ARDC, Gutierrez will serve as an ex-officio member of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, replacing Larkin. Gutierrez’s appointment is effective October 23, 2023. She is a graduate of Temple University’s James E.
The Court Opinion Greer was a target of one of Kiwi Farms’ attacks. The district court dismissed the contributory claim because the defendants didn’t materially contribute to the infringement. The appellate court revives the claim. The court says the defendants waived any fair use defense by briefing it inadequately.
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
In fact, this year’s annual meeting marked some major milestones as the CLA fully peeled away from the prior management of the State Bar of California in compliance with SB36 put into place January 1, 2018. . Morrison lecture series entitled Closing the Courthouse Doors.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content