This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I imagined I was an Iowa lawyer looking to develop a niche in agricultural law. I asked “What are good ideas for a niche legal blog on agriculture law in Iowa?” Overviews of Iowa’s statelaws and regulations related to farming and agriculture, including those pertaining to zoning, land use, and conservation.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown NoticesAmaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case FailsISE v.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v.
Next, from the early 2000s until 2017, the primary legal theory that was used to deter web scraping was the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or the CFAA. And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc. But given the fact that contracts, even online contracts, are a state-law issue, it’s hard to imagine a simple resolution to this problem.
“Courts in the Ninth Circuit have regularly held that the DMCA preempts statelaw claims arising out of submission of takedown notices.” ” 512(f) once again wipes out statelaw claims, even if 512(f) doesn’t apply. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Powerwand Inc.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown NoticesAmaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case FailsISE v.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v.
This guidance follows the FDA granting breakthrough therapy designation for MDMA to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in 2017 and for psilocybin in treatment-resistant depression in 2018. Drug laws in the USA The changes in US drug laws when it comes to psychedelics have happened at the state level.
2015-193 states that an attorney lacking the competence necessary for eDiscovery advocacy has three options: (1) acquire sufficient learning and skill before performance is required; (2) associate with or consult technical consultants or competent counsel; or (3) decline the client representation. 1, 2017, Florida adopted Rule 6-10.3 (b)
A spokesperson from Cruise stated that, “[f]or now, our vehicles will be manually driven by a human driver behind the wheel, but you might start to see them around as we get used to Raleigh’s driving environment.” ” But are there laws governing their use?
Following on the parking ticket win, Josh added new beta functionality to the app in 2017 on the heels of the massive Equifax data breach – he apparently also was swept up into the breach (notice a trend here?). Does DoNotPay violate statelaws on the unauthorized practice of law?
Background Banking organizations already are subject to reporting obligations of cyber events and data breaches under applicable federal and statelaws. At the state level, some banking organizations are subject to more recent and specific reporting requirements. Many other states’ laws are modeled on California’s law.
StateLaws Permitting but Regulating Collection and Use of Biometric Identifiers, including Facial Data. As noted, currently, only Illinois, Washington, and Texas have laws at the state level that aim to expressly and comprehensively address biometric privacy. In Santana v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. ,
230’s Immunity The post The Ninth Circuit’s FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense.
” The court reinforces that Section 230 applies to the TVPRA claim (a FOSTA claim) as a straightforward application of Doe v. Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. 230’s Immunity The post Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W.
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. 230’s Immunity The post DC Circuit Upholds FOSTA’s Constitutionality (By Narrowing It)–Woodhull v.
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. 230’s Immunity The post Instagram Defeats Lawsuit Claiming It Was a “Breeding Ground” for Sex Traffickers–Doe v.
230’s Immunity The post The 7th Circuit’s Section 230 Jurisprudence’s Impact on FOSTA Cases appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense.
Are there any examples of other states or international examples that this abuse of this data has been more hampered than here in California? Matt] 26:54 I’m not aware of a similar sharing prohibition, a limit on sharing of ALPR information in another statelaw. 27, 2017), [link] (last visited Dec. FOX40 (Sep.
The panel summarizes: “Because Does statelaw claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. Doe fails to state a plausible TVPRA claim, so Doe cannot invoke a statutory exception to 230 immunity.” The district court dismissed the case.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown NoticesAmaretto v. Spoiler: Not Well) * Another Section 512(f) Case FailsISE v.
The Florida federal court might also apply Florida statelaw, which includes the old Doe v. 230’s Immunity The post Five Decisions Illustrate How Section 230 Is Fading Fast appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The court acknowledges an almost identical case from a Florida district court case, Doe v.
Portman Says SESTA Doesnt Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. 230s Immunity The post Section 230 Immunizes OnlyFans for User-Uploaded Video (Again)Doe v.
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. Brunetti (2019) and strike down this trademark registration law as an unconstitutional regulation of speech protected by the First Amendment. Courts would find this expressive use of Trump’s name is permitted by defensive doctrines in those states’ laws, or is otherwise allowed by the First Amendment.
Portman Says SESTA Doesnt Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. 230s Immunity The post The Fifth Circuit’s Campaign to Undermine Section 230 Is Making Progress–AB v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content