This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It launched in 2017 to great fanfare, promising to “revolutionize legal services” through its dual-entity model of both a law firm and a technology company. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “30 Under 30.” But one thing for certain is that while some products shut down with a whimper, others go out with a bang.
I’m not going to get all analytical here, but it is noteworthy to those involved in litigation and related services. Compared to recent years where we have seen a lower volume but higher “run” rate (around 80% in 2017), this seems to indicate that the use of technology-driven litigation support services (e.g.,
Since starting Litigation-Tech in 2002 in the middle of the dot-com implosion, we've won a lot of cases, many long-term clients, and we've picked up a few awards along the way. by selecting Litigation-Tech. Ted Brooks Litigation-Tech LLC All materials Copyright Ted Brooks.
Today brings news that Gavelytics , a seven-year-old litigation analytics company, is closing its doors effective tomorrow. We built things never before built and answered litigation-related questions never before answerable. Merrill told me at the time of his 2017 launch. The reason, he said, is “a long story.” in funding.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
Long called Legaltech New York, it was renamed Legalweek in 2017 , and is one of the largest, longest-running and most-anticipated conferences focused on legal technology and the business of law, last year drawing over 6,000 attendees and featuring more than 300 speakers. Legalweek, Jan. 1 Legalweek is the OG of legal tech conferences.
As I reported yesterday, the plaintiff in the New York case, Silvia Diaz-Roa , filed the lawsuit against Hermes Law , a Texas law firm, and ClaimDeck , a litigation management system for insurers and insurance-defense firms that spun out of Hermes Law.
Best Courtroom Presentation Providers - Hall of Fame The Recorder 2015 This is the 3rd time readers have voted for Litigation-Tech as Best Courtroom Presentation Providers, and as a result, we will also receive the Hall of Fame Award. Thanks so much to all who voted!
Alma Asay Asay, a former litigator who founded the litigation management platform Allegory Law, first joined Crowell & Moring two years ago as senior director of practice innovation and client value, as I reported at the time. After Asay moved to Litera, it acquired Allegory from Integreon.
Courtroom5 is a unique justice tech company that addresses that problem by providing pro se litigants with the training, tools, documents and support they need to represent themselves. For litigants who need extra help, it also offers access to à la carte lawyer services.
billion purchase price and years of litigation that continues even now. Within a year, the company launched its native cloud platform, iManage Cloud, and then went on to make several key acquisitions, including of UK artificial intelligence company RAVN Systems in 2017 and of legal transaction management company Closing Folders in 2020.
” Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “ 30 Under 30.” See all my coverage of the Thomson Reuters-ROSS litigation.
Alma Asay , the former litigator who founded the litigation management platform Allegory Law, has joined the law firm Crowell & Moring as senior director of practice innovation and client value. When Allegory was purchased by Integreon Discovery Solutions in 2017, Asay became its chief innovation officer.
Ethics, Law & Technology Event Information Provider: Alameda County Bar Association Location: Alameda County Bar Association 1000 Broadway, Suite 480 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: 510-302-2222 Date: 08/23/2017 12:00 PM - 01:30 PM Credits: 0.5
A first-of-its-kind tool introduced last year to automate the drafting of litigation briefs has been named new product of the year for 2021 by the American Association of Law Libraries. In 2017, the award went to CARA , another first-of-its-kind product that analyzes briefs to find relevant cases they omit. Second Product Award.
Many reprints were available on earlier versions of the Litigation-Tech website. Ted Brooks But first, here is the most-popular article of 2017: Ten PowerPoint Tips for the Courtroom The Archive Articles Archive Contents - This is sort of a directory, although not all-inclusive. I truly hope you appreciate it.
In 2017, it was less than 1%. All this despite the increase in overall civil litigation over the last 85 years. But legal professionals will tell you that that is simply no longer the case. When the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect in 1938, 20% of federal civil cases were resolved with a trial. Why is this important?
In 2017, it was less than 1%. All this despite the increase in overall civil litigation over the last 85 years. But legal professionals will tell you that that is simply no longer the case. When the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect in 1938, 20% of federal civil cases were resolved with a trial. Why is this important?
Leah Reviews, designed to assist customers with understanding, analyzing and supporting complex queries across transactions, M&A, litigations, contracts, compliance, policy, and regulatory paperwork. Leah Extracts, which enables customers to extract essential legal data from any legal documentation with only three clicks.
Pre/Dicta , claiming itself the only litigation analytics platform that makes predictions about the outcome of federal lawsuits, announced the acquisition of Gavelytics, a pioneering judicial analytics platform for state court cases. This deal is a major milestone for Pre/Dicta and the entire field of predictive litigation analytics.
Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ suit in its entirety, holding that plaintiffs had no cognizable claim for damages or injunctive relief because they failed at this stage of litigation to demonstrate that they had been harmed in any way by OpenAI’s actions. Highway Inn, Inc., App’x 674 (9th Cir.
Given that they are litigating 512(f), your wish was partially granted. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) CaseAutomattic v. I imagine some of you want both of them to lose.
A new integration between two litigation-focused legal technology products connects more than 500 million federal and state litigation dockets and documents with a database of expert witness and judicial profiles, with the aim of helping lawyers better evaluate expert witnesses.
Jason Fyk’s recent litigation campaign reminds me of the classic story Moby Dick, with Fyk in the Captain Ahab role and Section 230 as his white whale. The court says the issue of standing to challenge 230’s constitutionality was already litigated and decisively resolved in AFDI v. Freedom Def. Initiative v.
” That prompted this litigation. CV H-17-1068, 2017 WL 2957912, at *8 (S.D. July 11, 2017) (holding that “the mere purchase of AdWords alone, without directing a consumer to a potentially confusing web page, is not sufficient for a claim of trademark infringement,” citing Mary Kay, 601 F. ” Uh oh. See Tempur-Pedic N.
In 2020, the company introduced a first-of-its-kind product, Compose , that automates the drafting of litigation briefs. That, too, won the AALL product of the year award in 2017 and spawned a slew of similar products from other legal technology companies.
Yet a 2017 study by law firm Baker McKenzie found that less than a third of companies maintain inventories of trade secrets and have action plans for responding to theft. “If you can’t be specific about what the asset is, then good luck litigating it,” Londergan said. Who has access to the trade secret?
For nearly 30 years, from 1989 to 2017, Miller was with inData Corporation, most of those years as its president and CEO. Derek Miller When e-discovery company Ipro acquired inData in 2017, Miller moved there, taking on the role of vice president of product solutions until he left the company in 2021.
For nearly 30 years, from 1989 to 2017, Miller was with inData Corporation, most of those years as its president and CEO. Derek Miller When e-discovery company Ipro acquired inData in 2017, Miller moved there, taking on the role of vice president of product solutions until he left the company in 2021.
Courtroom5 is a unique justice tech company that addresses that problem by providing pro se litigants with the training, tools, documents and support they need to represent themselves. For litigants who need extra help, it also offers access to à la carte lawyer services.
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. For instance in, In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig. , 18, 2017) the court refused to shift costs “for time spent arguing. Securities Litigation , Case No.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the social media companies. Next, from the early 2000s until 2017, the primary legal theory that was used to deter web scraping was the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or the CFAA. And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc. LinkedIn Corp.
Merlin’s chief data scientist, William Webber , is a highly regarded data scientist who earned his doctoral degree in information retrieval and who did his postdoctoral research at the University of Maryland in development of search technology for discovery of evidence in civil litigation.
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. On that front, the plaintiffs’ other key piece of evidence came from a 2017 meeting between YouTube “queer” creators and Google’s Vice President of Product Management, Johanna Wright.
. “They’re building these workflows and these legal products into which they have put all of their expertise and that their clients or their customers can also, in turn, trust to give them a process to get to the resolution in a particular matter, whether that’s a transactional matter or litigation matter.
The SCOTUS blog took a look at data from the 2017 term to identify patterns. One element that they looked for was if gender imbalances in oral argument interruptions of previous years continued in 2017. The post Pardon the Interruptions appeared first on Liquid Litigation Management. The same holds true in the Supreme Court.
This post outlines the DOJ’s antitrust case against Apple, and explores potential changes that Apple could make to its ecosystem in light of the litigation. Antitrust allegations against Apple: Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization and attempted monopolization of any part of trade or commerce.
Excitement and expectations grew when long-established law firm document management software (DMS) provider iManage acquired RAVN in 2017. Our design and deployment efforts began in late 2017 and continued through 2018 into the late summer of 2019 culminating in our broad scale pilot. Why the excitement?
I reported last summer that the pioneering state litigation analytics company was shutting down. Today’s press release reports that Gavelytics will live again as the core of Pre/Dicta ‘s state court predictive litigation component. said Merrill, who is joining Pre/Dicta as its strategic advisor.
In 2017, Google ran into these very issues. Due to the high risk of data re-identification, we might expect litigation against companies innovating in the healthcare realm to be common. In short, HIPAA’s de-identification requirements may not be sufficient to protect sensitive patient data.
In 2017, Google ran into these very issues. Due to the high risk of data re-identification, we might expect litigation against companies innovating in the healthcare realm to be common. In short, HIPAA’s de-identification requirements may not be sufficient to protect sensitive patient data.
The picture at issue was taken in 2017, and was registered with the U.S. Copyright Office on July 29, 2017. Other cases where Oppenheimer has been a litigant show that he has some licensing history, however minimal. The Board looked to previous outcomes of litigants to make sure there was no windfall. Oppenheimer Decl. ¶
Way back in 2017, Jim was our first guest and he talked about what was then a fairly recent change to Comment 8 to Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 (a lawyer’s duty of competence). Jim counsels attorneys and businesses on legal ethics issues and represents attorneys and attorney candidates in ARDC proceedings.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content