This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Let’s revisit five of the most momentous legal tech fails of the last 10 years. It launched in 2017 to great fanfare, promising to “revolutionize legal services” through its dual-entity model of both a law firm and a technology company. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “30 Under 30.” ROSS Intelligence.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
” Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “ 30 Under 30.” See all my coverage of the Thomson Reuters-ROSS litigation.
The legalresearch company Casetext has raised $25 million in a Series C funding round, bringing its total amount raised to $64.3 In 2020, the company introduced a first-of-its-kind product, Compose , that automates the drafting of litigation briefs. million since its founding in 2013.
A first-of-its-kind tool introduced last year to automate the drafting of litigation briefs has been named new product of the year for 2021 by the American Association of Law Libraries. In 2017, the award went to CARA , another first-of-its-kind product that analyzes briefs to find relevant cases they omit.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
The legalresearch company Casetext has raised $25 million in a Series C funding round, bringing its total amount raised to $64.3 In 2020, the company introduced a first-of-its-kind product, Compose , that automates the drafting of litigation briefs. million since its founding in 2013.
A new integration between two litigation-focused legal technology products connects more than 500 million federal and state litigation dockets and documents with a database of expert witness and judicial profiles, with the aim of helping lawyers better evaluate expert witnesses.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. As a private-public partnership through the UC Berkeley Skydeck, we have been connecting over 10,000 attorney and 12,000 litigation support providers in real time.
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legalresearch startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., That’s bunk.
Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “ 30 Under 30.” See all my coverage of the Thomson Reuters-ROSS litigation.
Context in One Sentence Context on Lexis Advance is a new litigation analytics product that enables you to visualize and leverage the historical record of experts and judges to draft better arguments. The Killer Feature Context grew out of Ravel Law , which LexisNexis acquired in 2017. You're much better off analyzing actual data.
Docket Alarm is positioning the new tool as one for business intelligence, but based on a demo I had seen last month at the American Association of Law Libraries conference, it is a potentially powerful tool for anyone involved in federal court litigation. Once you can see the motions, it’s hard to imagine litigating blind without them.”.
837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. L48 2017 (Study Aid). Law Library Research Fellow Moot Court Advocacy Board Judicial Board Member [1] 50 C.F.R. Federal administrative law impacts nearly every element of our lives.
Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. As a private-public partnership through the UC Berkeley Skydeck, we have been connecting over 10,000 attorney and 12,000 litigation support providers in real time.
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative? Anything else?
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legalresearch startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., That’s bunk.
So this week we have a just star studded episode was some absolute Yeah, we got some power players in the legal technology industry, especially when it comes to practical uses of products like OpenAI’s GPT-4.for for everything from legalresearch to how to scope your legal work. So they’re using it for legalresearch.
But this year, they seem to span the gamut of topics I cover, from analytics to artificial intelligence, from legal ethics to legalresearch, from new companies starting up to established companies shutting down, from products designed for litigation to products embroiled in litigation. Here’s What Happened.
So this week we have a just star studded episode was some absolute Yeah, we got some power players in the legal technology industry, especially when it comes to practical uses of products like OpenAI’s GPT-4.for for everything from legalresearch to how to scope your legal work. So they’re using it for legalresearch.
Rather, they were about ransomware attacks, regulatory reform, industry news, and new legalresearch tools. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ).
Rather, they were about ransomware attacks, regulatory reform, industry news, and new legalresearch tools. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content