This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I imagined I was an Iowa lawyer looking to develop a niche in agricultural law. I asked “What are good ideas for a niche legal blog on agriculture law in Iowa?” Overviews of Iowa’s statelaws and regulations related to farming and agriculture, including those pertaining to zoning, land use, and conservation.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown NoticesAmaretto v. Weiner * Fair Use Its the Law (for what its worth)Lenz v.
LinkedIn and Facebook, most notably, have done as much as anyone to shape the law of web scraping. This is true even though the law does not recognize that they have a property interest in it, and even if though expressly disclaim any property rights in that data in their terms of use. And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc.
The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? ” PREACH! Federici * Biosafe-One v.
Even as the laws surrounding cannabis vary around the country, some states are going beyond this drug to explore changing regulations around psychedelic drugs. laws also less frequently mentioned MDMA, peyote/mescaline, ibogaine, LSD, and DMT/ayahuasca. There are some exceptions for certain drugs in federal law.
Comment 8 states: “To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.”
A spokesperson from Cruise stated that, “[f]or now, our vehicles will be manually driven by a human driver behind the wheel, but you might start to see them around as we get used to Raleigh’s driving environment.” ” But are there laws governing their use?
And what’s a company to do right now, with facial recognition opportunities presenting themselves today while the law remains a moving target? In this Part 1, we lay out the current laws governing facial recognition in the United States. The Patchwork of Current Facial Recognition Privacy Laws A.
Following on the parking ticket win, Josh added new beta functionality to the app in 2017 on the heels of the massive Equifax data breach – he apparently also was swept up into the breach (notice a trend here?). Does DoNotPay violate statelaws on the unauthorized practice of law?
Background Banking organizations already are subject to reporting obligations of cyber events and data breaches under applicable federal and statelaws. At the state level, some banking organizations are subject to more recent and specific reporting requirements. Many other states’ laws are modeled on California’s law.
As a result, UMG apparently makes the blanket assumption that it owns every element of a sound recording in its catalog, leading to overenforcements like this one where it apparently is enforcing its status as a non-exclusive licensee of the beat (which copyright law doesn’t permit). Longarzo * Another 512(f) Case Fails–Handshoe v.
With that framing, trademark law protects against the unwanted competition, and the court treats this as an easy rightsowner win. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Longarzo * Another 512(f) Case Fails–Handshoe v.
Additionally, App Star argues that the applications are denied copyright protection and that “Bar-Z knew or should have known that the design elements cited in the DMCA Notification” are not subject to protection under copyright law. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Federici * Biosafe-One v.
“Courts in the Ninth Circuit have regularly held that the DMCA preempts statelaw claims arising out of submission of takedown notices.” ” 512(f) once again wipes out statelaw claims, even if 512(f) doesn’t apply. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Powerwand Inc.
However, FOSTA was not designed as an anti-CSAM law, so the plaintiffs’ claims don’t really fit the legal doctrine. Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. If you’re new to FOSTA cases and you are baffled by the layers of inferences and arguments here, you are definitely not alone.
US (Guest Blog Post) * Catching Up on FOSTA Since Its Enactment (A Linkwrap) * More Aftermath from the ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’ * ‘Worst of Both Worlds’ FOSTA Signed Into Law, Completing Section 230’s Evisceration * Backpage Loses Another Section 230 Motion (Again Without SESTA/FOSTA)–Florida Abolitionists v.
The BTLJ Podcast team sits down with ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Matt Cagle to discuss the use of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) by police departments and other law enforcement entities. Podcast Transcript: [Tiffaney] 0:12 You’re listening to the Berkeley Technology Law Journal Podcast. I’m Tiffaney Boyd.
The plaintiffs claim that, “by enabling the transmission of ephemeral content on the application, Defendants facilitate the exchange of CSAM, and that Snap’s design of the application assists users in ‘evad[ing] supervision by legal guardians or law enforcement.'” Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense.
Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v.
Here, if the law recognized the illegality of “possessing” illegal content, then the upload could create its own legally recognizable harm even if it’s never meant for, or made available for, downloading. WebGroup Czech Republic appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The Lemmon v.
In response to a facial constitutional challenge to FOSTA, the DC Circuit upheld the law after making several narrowing constructions. The remaining ambiguity over its scope chills and inhibits socially beneficial and completely legal behavior, but the law doesn’t help reduce illegal behavior.
US (Guest Blog Post) * Catching Up on FOSTA Since Its Enactment (A Linkwrap) * More Aftermath from the Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA * Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA Signed Into Law, Completing Section 230s Evisceration * Backpage Loses Another Section 230 Motion (Again Without SESTA/FOSTA)Florida Abolitionists v.
Most FOSTA opinions are lengthy, but this one was short because the law was quite clear. Backpage appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Wielding those arguments should help Doe get around Section 230, though the case should then fail for other reasons. Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense.
The court says the claim fails on its prima facie elements because “Plaintiffs have failed to establish that Salesforce had constructive knowledge that Backpage violated relevant sex-trafficking laws as to Plaintiff.” Google LLC , 2024 WL 1892291 (N.D. April 29, 2024). The complaint. This case started in W.D.
The panel summarizes: “Because Does statelaw claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. Doe fails to state a plausible TVPRA claim, so Doe cannot invoke a statutory exception to 230 immunity.” The district court dismissed the case.
US (Guest Blog Post) * Catching Up on FOSTA Since Its Enactment (A Linkwrap) * More Aftermath from the ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’ * ‘Worst of Both Worlds’ FOSTA Signed Into Law, Completing Section 230’s Evisceration * Backpage Loses Another Section 230 Motion (Again Without SESTA/FOSTA)–Florida Abolitionists v.
The court also awards a default judgment for tortious interference based on bogus takedown notices, despite the many cases holding that 512(f) preempts statelaw equivalents (including the Hyphy case below). Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Weiner * Fair Use Its the Law (for what its worth)Lenz v.
In those circusmtances, copyright law is an especially attractive tool to the pugilists, with its strict liability standards, amorphous fair use boundaries, high defense costs, and effectiveness of takedown notices. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Kilgore , 2024 WL 5295080 (W.D.
The court’s statement implicates Internet Law Exceptionalism 101, and this judge–who was so thorough in other discussions–oddly chose to ignore this critical question. The Florida federal court might also apply Florida statelaw, which includes the old Doe v. and other minors.
” “The law is clear that a service provider doesn’t shed Section 230 immunity when it neutrally promotes all its users content in the same way (as Fenix allegedly did here).” Fenix appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Portman Says SESTA Doesnt Affect the Good Samaritan Defense.
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey , Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? Tam (2017) and Iancu v.
The court responds: “Pointing to persuasive case law, Fenix contends that Plaintiff’s allegations far well short of what is needed to overcome CDA immunity. Mindgeek , but the court says that’s “bad law” following the Reddit decision. The plaintiff cited Doe v.
If so, many vendors will be pressured not to accept lawful engagements with paying customers because they would face impossible-to-manage potential liability exposure. * * * Despite the serious problems with tertiary liability in Section 230 cases, the courts have entertained it. Note: the opinion was written by Trump 1.0-appointed
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content