This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This protects the researcher from the AI “creating” the answer from all the non-relevant information it has collected in its large language model of machinelearning. The MyJr product works as a browser extension and identifies Canadian and US caselaw citations on any web page. And they wanted to explore legal.
We ultimately decided to apply a machinelearning (ML) comparison model that would set the contract clauses side by side with the legislative text in order to assess the contract’s compliance level. We drafted an application where the end user would only have to understand their own contract and not need to bother with the law itself.
Next, we plan to expand the product’s scope to cover more aspects of the litigation process, to improve the machinelearning summarization model, and to develop visualizations of evidence based on the data present in the chronology. Founded: 10/11/2016, Vancouver, Canada. Target customer: solo, small and medium law firms.
Next, we plan to expand the product’s scope to cover more aspects of the litigation process, to improve the machinelearning summarization model, and to develop visualizations of evidence based on the data present in the chronology. Founded: 10/11/2016, Vancouver, Canada. Target customer: solo, small and medium law firms.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content