This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
494 (2015), which examined whether specific state professional regulatory boards could be sued for antitrust violations. The Supreme Court ruled on February 25, 2015, that state regulatory boards, composed mainly of active market participants, are not immune from antitrust liability unless actively supervised by the state government.
According to the 2015 National Center for State Courts’ Civil Justice Initiative: The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State Courts study, at least one party was self-represented in 76% of civil cases in state courts.
Founded: 6/15/2015. Target customer: Five verticals: arbitrators/arbitration centers; mediators/mediation centers; law firms (Slaughter & May, others); courts (Federal Court of Australia, FamilyCourt); corporations and associations (Sports NZ – New Zealand’s Ministry of sport). Immediation.
Founded: 6/15/2015. Target customer: Five verticals: arbitrators/arbitration centers; mediators/mediation centers; law firms (Slaughter & May, others); courts (Federal Court of Australia, FamilyCourt); corporations and associations (Sports NZ – New Zealand’s Ministry of sport). Immediation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
59 
Let's personalize your content