This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
“So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
Constandinos (Deno) Himonas, the Utah Supreme Court justice who spearheaded the state’s first-of-its-kind regulatory sandbox to license new forms of legal services and providers, is retiring from the court. That is the power and beauty of the Supreme Court’s rule changes and the legal regulatory sandbox.”.
A litigator before founding Clearbrief, Schafer said that assembling a timeline is one of the first things a lawyer has to do when starting a new case. In one example that Schafer showed me, the timeline included the entry, “December 2015: First controlled buy at Yakima stash house,” with a link to the record.
Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ suit in its entirety, holding that plaintiffs had no cognizable claim for damages or injunctive relief because they failed at this stage of litigation to demonstrate that they had been harmed in any way by OpenAI’s actions. 21, 2015), aff’d , 700 F.
We work on both sides of the table, and although our primary market is the California courts, we do cover other areas now and then, including a recent $200M arbitration in New York City. Coincidentally, we recently won awards in New York Law Journal for Best Trial Consultant, and Best "Hot Seat" Trial Technicians!
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.
The discovery process is a critical element of litigation, and objections to discovery requests are every bit as essential. Any legal professional working in litigation needs to know how to make these objections, and how to respond when the opposing side makes them. Response [applying federal court standard]: Objection.
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. 23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.”
District Court for the District of Columbia granted plaintiff Guo Wengui’s motion to compel production of a report (the “Report”)—and related materials—prepared by forensic vendor Duff & Phelps in Guo’s lawsuit against the law firm that formerly represented him, Clark Hill, PLC (the “Firm”). Breach Litig. , See Wengui v.
The City was found to be grossly negligent in issuing and executing its litigation hold for the preservation of email and text messages. The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. Stinson, at *5.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
The court applies the standard three-part Section 230 test: ICS Provider. Instead, the court says that “this conduct simply does not make Meta an information content provider… The allegations in the SAC show that third parties voluntarily provided all the content at issue here.” ” The court is confused.
Constandinos (Deno) Himonas, the Utah Supreme Court justice who spearheaded the state’s first-of-its-kind regulatory sandbox to license new forms of legal services and providers, is retiring from the court. That is the power and beauty of the Supreme Court’s rule changes and the legal regulatory sandbox.”.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that the Illinois Supreme Court has appointed John K. Sinclair has served on the Commission since 2015 and was appointed Chair in 2019. Sinclair has served on the Commission since 2015 and was appointed Chair in 2019. Sinclair, Jr.,
Determining when a party “knew or should have known that litigation was imminent” is often a free fall into analyzing the facts of when a party had notice of a lawsuit. 23, 2015, No. CIV-14-899-D) 2015 U.S. The Court noted that the Defendant was pro se and should have been aware of the relevance of the parachute.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
So we don’t demand competency in ourselves or our litigation associates. California Formal Opinion 2015-193 talks about three noteworthy and ethical points: 1. So let’s do the same with ESI. It’s not something I, as an important big shot lawyer, need to lower myself to deal with. That required some knowledge of e-discovery.
The new Rules are designed to bring balance to litigation, not leave it in tatters. 9, 2015, No. 2:14-cv-1131) 2015 U.S. 26(b)(1), that District Courts are to limit discovery where the “burden or expense. 26(b)(1), that District Courts are to limit discovery where the “burden or expense. Goodman Mfg. S.D.Ohio Dec.
LinkedIn case, which up until now was the most important case in the history of US web-scraping litigation. The Delaware court stayed proceedings pending the California action. First, the court found that there was no evidence of logged-in scraping in the record. According to the court: The U.S. Meta sued in California.
Instead, the Court dressed down the attorneys on their meet and confer efforts: This discovery dispute has quickly transformed into a behemoth, replete with competing and disputed descriptions of at the Parties’ efforts to meet and confer. 23, 2015, No. C14-1443RAJ) 2015 U.S. C14-1443RAJ) 2015 U.S.
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. 3, 2015) Doe v. App Store Simulated Casino-Style Games Litigation , 2022 WL 4009918 (N.D. March 14, 2013) Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC, 965 F.Supp.2d
Browder achieved international recognition when, at just 17 years old in 2015, he founded DoNotPay, touted as the world’s first robot lawyer, to help people appeal parking tickets. On this episode of LawNext: Joshua Browder , founder of DoNotPay. The company claims the app has saved motorists in the U.S. and UK many millions of dollars.
The Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., 837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. The Supreme Court ordered two factually similar cases consolidated, Loper Bright Enterprises v. 11] Image: US District Court. 14] III.
Two days later, the Utah Supreme Court voted unanimously to approve the report’s recommendations, including substantially loosening regulatory restrictions on lawyers and creating a “regulatory sandbox” to allow a market of non-traditional legal entities to provide legal services in the state. Gary Herbert.
This initiative launched in 2015 with a list of innovators and leaders in legal technology and with this year’s additions, that list now includes 141 talented and influential women leaders. I think legal tech, much like litigation where I began my career, is primarily about people.
On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of Legal Research at Blue J. He led the team of lawyers and research analysts and helped develop AI-informed predictive tools, which predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations.
On this episode of LawNext, Conrad joins host Bob Ambrogi for an in-depth discussion of the company she and cofounder Kristen Sonday launched in 2015. Before founding Paladin, Conrad was a litigator in the New York office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Browder achieved international recognition when, at just 17 years old in 2015, he founded DoNotPay, touted as the world’s first robot lawyer, to help people appeal parking tickets. On this episode of LawNext: Joshua Browder , founder of DoNotPay. The company claims the app has saved motorists in the U.S. and UK many millions of dollars.
A litigator before founding Clearbrief, Schafer said that assembling a timeline is one of the first things a lawyer has to do when starting a new case. In one example that Schafer showed me, the timeline included the entry, “December 2015: First controlled buy at Yakima stash house,” with a link to the record.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
After just a couple of years at the ARDC—an entity charged by the Illinois Supreme Court with upholding the legal profession’s integrity in Illinois—Larkin began to realize he might have found the place where he could accomplish his mission. “As He was a gentleman when he appeared before the court,” Grogan said. “He
So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
According to the 2015 National Center for State Courts’ Civil Justice Initiative: The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State Courts study, at least one party was self-represented in 76% of civil cases in state courts.
At the outset, the Utah Supreme Court recognized the importance of data collection and program evaluation, and has tasked IAALS to serve as an independent third-party evaluator for the sandbox. This regulatory sandbox model was built largely on the model IAALS developed and published in 2019. The Utah sandbox just turned three.
Judge Wang also made it a point to highlight the Chief Justice’s note that Rule 1 gives both lawyers and the Court an affirmative duty to work together to resolve disputes efficiently. Many courts have treated (E)(i) and (E)(ii) as “supplementary rather than alternative.” However, the Court noted the case was not ordinary.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
And we can do it here in the district where the where, where the litigation is. Yeah, a lot of courts there are a lot of there’s just a lot of adoption that’s required for something like that. But tell me about this little team. And I went to one of the sessions, which was called document review. Obviously, we had a tool.
In July, 2015, ALM’s Legaltech News last unveiled the winners of the LTN Innovation Awards, an annual recognition of the best legal technology leaders, products and projects in the legal community. Three and a half years have passed and now it's time to once again recognize industry leaders in legal technology innovation.
He has also been admitted to practice before the United State Supreme Court. He was also named one of Houston’s Top Lawyers for Technology by HTexas Magazine in both 2014 and 2015. I stumbled into legaltech in the mid-90s as a law student when I got hired to a company building Access databases for mass tort litigation defense.
On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of Legal Research at Blue J. He led the team of lawyers and research analysts and helped develop AI-informed predictive tools, which predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations.
And we can do it here in the district where the where, where the litigation is. Yeah, a lot of courts there are a lot of there’s just a lot of adoption that’s required for something like that. But tell me about this little team. And I went to one of the sessions, which was called document review. Obviously, we had a tool.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content