This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It examines the discovery, exhibits, pleadings and other documents in a case and automatically finds and displays citations to the source documents that provide the factual support, as well as caselaw, statutes and regulations. The first controlled buy took place at that stash house.” million seed round.
The free release of 40 million pages of state and federal court decisions, comprising some 40,000 books of caselaw, is the culmination of a project that Harvard Law started in 2015 with support from Ravel Law and LexisNexis.
This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., the morning of a critical meeting at Harvard Law School, where I worked. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. But historically we’ve not treated the law this way. I hit the brakes. The truck kept rolling.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
The MyJr product works as a browser extension and identifies Canadian and US caselaw citations on any web page. It delivers a preview into key details about the cited case, and a link to a free full-text version, in a popup when the user hovers over the citation. I was CEO at kami Canadian legal information Institute.
It examines the discovery, exhibits, pleadings and other documents in a case and automatically finds and displays citations to the source documents that provide the factual support, as well as caselaw, statutes and regulations. The first controlled buy took place at that stash house.” million seed round.
When Jerome “Jerry” Larkin joined the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) in 1978, he had just graduated from Loyola University Chicago School of Law, spent eight years in the Catholic seminary system, and knew he wanted to dedicate his career to public service. He was a gentleman in dealings with his opponents.
This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., the morning of a critical meeting at Harvard Law School, where I worked. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. But historically we’ve not treated the law this way. I hit the brakes. The truck kept rolling.
Spillover precedents are cases with redistributive downward ripple effects that subsequently benefit pro se litigants. To focus the inquiry, the Article carried out an empirical study of Tax Courtcases from 2015-2019 in which pro se litigants won. reason was being employed in the case.
And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the caselaw discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. Or courts or states? And give me the answer right up top right.
And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the caselaw discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. Or courts or states? And give me the answer right up top right.
These are individuals if they have a credible claim for relief from removal, they have every reason to show up in immigration court for their hearings, these are the things that a risk tool, ostensibly measures. And what we see really since 2014 2015, is that for people in custody, detention has been the default.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content