2014 Litigation Machine learning 
LawSites
AUGUST 10, 2021
Alexander Hudek , a computer scientist, founded the company in 2011, originally under the name DiligenceEngine (which I reviewed in 2014 ). The company developed what was the first of a now-common class of products that use machine learning for contract review and analysis. Waisberg will serve as a strategic advisor to Litera.
Colin S. Levy
APRIL 30, 2024
The platform itself was a marvel, a testament to the incredible power of artificial intelligence and machine learning to transform the way we approach the law. Oxford University Press, 2014. Oxford University Press, 2014. Zahavi, Dan. Phenomenology: The Basics. Routledge, 2018. Dreyfus, Hubert L. Clark, Andy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Colin S. Levy
MARCH 7, 2023
Josh Blandi is the CEO and Co-Founder of UniCourt , a SaaS offering using machine learning to disrupt the way court data is organized, accessed, and used. Some of the biggest lessons I’ve learned along the way, are that once you are onto something good that’s worthy of your time, stay the course.
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
OCTOBER 30, 2023
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? That’s obviously good for litigators. And maybe I’m a litigator that wants to say that the other side has said that California applies. And we also have Spanish data.
LawSites
MARCH 18, 2024
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. After an exhausting year of negotiations, it was time to lock ourselves in a room and figure out if we had a deal. About the Author Adam Ziegler is a lawyer and software builder.
Richmond Journal of Law and Technology
JULY 24, 2023
This article briefly addresses this problem, summarizes current local, state, and federal laws enacted or proposed to curtail it, and proposes two solutions for modern employers itching to implement AI-assisted employee management tools but dreading employment litigation. Others do not. 8] See, e.g. , Force v. . & Stuart Geiger et al.,
Legal Tech Monitor
OCTOBER 30, 2023
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? That’s obviously good for litigators. And maybe I’m a litigator that wants to say that the other side has said that California applies. And we also have Spanish data.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content