This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
My 2019 post detailed my visit to ROSS’s Toronto research and development office. But ROSS’s trajectory changed in 2020, when legalresearch giant Thomson Reuters filed a lawsuit against ROSS , alleging that it stole content from Westlaw to build its own competing legalresearch product.
2013 New LegalResearch Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. 2014 Two Sites Offer Platforms for Crowdsourced LegalResearch. 2017 LegalResearch Company Casetext Closes on $12 Million in Funding. Casetext Expands Its CARA Research Assistant, Adding Suggestions Of Relevant Briefs.
ROSS was ahead of its time in striving to use artificial intelligence to empower legalresearch. It started in 2014 at the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. ROSS Intelligence.
In 2014, Medina sued Microsoft. In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. The court says Medina has no probability of prevailing against the repository websites due to Section 230: Medina does not dispute that legalresearch defendants are interactive computer service providers. Hearst case.
“Your affiant has never utilized Chat GPT as a source for conducting legalresearch prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false,” his affidavit said. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. Technology Incompetence?
In LawNext Episode 48 , host Bob Ambrogi traveled to Toronto to record a live interview with the founders of the AI-driven legalresearch platform ROSS Intelligence , CEO Andrew Arruda and CTO Jimoh Ovbiagele , in which they discussed the company’s rise from startup in 2014 to a more mature and established company.
2013 New LegalResearch Site Combines Case Law with Crowdsourcing. 2014 Two Sites Offer Platforms for Crowdsourced LegalResearch. 2017 LegalResearch Company Casetext Closes on $12 Million in Funding. Casetext Expands Its CARA Research Assistant, Adding Suggestions Of Relevant Briefs.
Legalcomplex was my notebook chronicling the history of legal technology, starting in 2011. In 2014, I started experimenting with new concepts, and the most popular was Legalpioneer.org. In 2019, I decided to quit my job and go full in on market research for the legal industry.
On this episode of LawNext, host Bob Ambrogi travels to Toronto to sit down for a live recording with the founders of the AI-driven legalresearch platform ROSS Intelligence , CEO Andrew Arruda and CTO Jimoh Ovbiagele.
My 2019 post detailed my visit to ROSS’s Toronto research and development office. But ROSS’s trajectory changed in 2020, when legalresearch giant Thomson Reuters filed a lawsuit against ROSS , alleging that it stole content from Westlaw to build its own competing legalresearch product.
Your affiant has never utilized Chat GPT as a source for conducting legalresearch prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false,” his affidavit said. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. Technology Incompetence?
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legalresearch startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., We decided not to.
Denton and published by the South Carolina Bar in 2014. S55 D46 2014. Lawyers and law students interested in learning more about premises liability should also consult the book, The Law of Slip & Fall in South Carolina , by Daniel R. You can find this print book in the law library, call number SC KFS 1990.S55
Hollywood’s Copyright Wars: From Edison to the Internet , by Peter Decherney, Call No. Clearance & Copyright: Everything You Need to Know for Film and Television , by Michael C. Donaldson and Lisa A. Callif, Call No. Notes [1] Dave Smith, Steamboat Willie , Library of Congress, [link] (last visited Mar. 25, 2024). [2] 2] Supra. [3] 3] Supra. [4]
What we discovered was that getting bulk access to court data on the trial court level, let alone streaming real-time court data feeds, was not available from any of the larger legacy legalresearch providers or it was otherwise astronomically expensive and still lacking in data coverage.
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legalresearch startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., We decided not to.
But this year, they seem to span the gamut of topics I cover, from analytics to artificial intelligence, from legal ethics to legalresearch, from new companies starting up to established companies shutting down, from products designed for litigation to products embroiled in litigation. Here’s What Happened.
So all of the product ideas I’ve had since 2014, are now within reach, and almost trivial to be able to do. And And now, computers are able to eat 90% of humans on the bar exam, right? So so it does language really well. seriatim very quickly.
Rather, they were about ransomware attacks, regulatory reform, industry news, and new legalresearch tools. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ).
Rather, they were about ransomware attacks, regulatory reform, industry news, and new legalresearch tools. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content