2014 e-filing Litigation 
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). Given this paucity of U.S. Lee Partners.
Eric Goldman
MAY 15, 2024
1962 (2014). 2014) (collecting cases). Combining these two holdings, it concluded: “we must apply the discovery rule to determine when a copyright infringement claim accrues, but a three-year lookback period from the time a suit is filed to determine the extent of the relief available.” Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. , 663, 134 S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. legal tech companies go public: alternative legal services provider LegalZoom (Nasdaq:LZ), legal technology company Intapp (Nasdaq:INTA), and e-discovery company DISCO (NYSE:LAW). Given this paucity of U.S. Lee Partners.
Eric Goldman
JUNE 20, 2023
The Road Not Taken At this point, no lawsuit had been filed; and the dispute probably could have been, and certainly should have been, easily resolved. In April 2017, it filed a lawsuit against Goldsmith and her agency (now known as Lynn Goldsmith, Ltd., She contacted AWF and advised it that the illustration infringed her copyright.
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
OCTOBER 30, 2023
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? That’s obviously good for litigators. And maybe I’m a litigator that wants to say that the other side has said that California applies. And we also have Spanish data.
Richmond Journal of Law and Technology
JULY 24, 2023
This article briefly addresses this problem, summarizes current local, state, and federal laws enacted or proposed to curtail it, and proposes two solutions for modern employers itching to implement AI-assisted employee management tools but dreading employment litigation. July 17, 2020), [link] [13] See generally Keith E. 1 (2022). [14]
Legal Tech Monitor
OCTOBER 30, 2023
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? That’s obviously good for litigators. And maybe I’m a litigator that wants to say that the other side has said that California applies. And we also have Spanish data.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content