2014 Court e-discovery 
Discovery Advocate
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018
The practice of e-discovery has always incorporated considerations of new and emerging technologies as well as related attorney competence. This focus on the cloud came to a head in the 2014 Brown v.
LawSites
MAY 30, 2023
My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. This was out of my bailiwick.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
Legal Tech Monitor
MAY 30, 2023
My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. Did that excuse garner sympathy from the court?
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
Eric Goldman
MAY 15, 2024
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”
Eric Goldman
JUNE 20, 2023
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content