This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In 2014, Medina sued Microsoft. Microsoft’s filings made some unredacted disclosures about Medina that were repeated in an unredacted court opinion, and those documents appeared on several websites that publish court documents. In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. Hearst case.
Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The firm had filed a voluntary dismissal back in 2014. In a typical year, most courts maintain a schedule for submission of new rules and changes to existing rules.
“So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. . federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
Multiple pieces of news today from PacerPro , a company that enables law firms to automate the workflow around distributing and capturing federal court filings. As she steps into this new job, an immediate priority will be directing PacerPro’s expansion into state courts. I first wrote about PacerPro in 2014 for the ABA Journal.
It started in 2014 at the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. (You can find my full series of posts about Bluford here.) ROSS Intelligence. There is, however, a somewhat happy ending to the story of Gavelytics.
The Arizona Supreme Court has approved the first three entities to be licensed as alternative business structures, enabling businesses owned by non-lawyers to deliver legal services under the liberalized licensing rules the court approved last August. Court order approving application.). Court order approving application.).
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” 1962 (2014).
In 2014, California enacted AB2365 , sometimes called the “Yelp law,” codified at Cal. had been mostly invisible in court opinions. recently started showing up more in court opinions–but not necessarily in a good way. of their cases in state court. March 27, 2024) (refusing remand to state court) Mora v.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
This case hit my alerts because of its discussion about keyword advertising, but first, I have to digest how the court got there. The court said that the trademark owner had been using the trademark since 1985 and registered the trademark in 2006. ” Say what? ” That prompted this litigation. ” Uh oh. ” UGH.
Blue J’s core product uses AI to analyze tax scenarios and predict how courts will resolve them, often with 90% accuracy, the company says. Blue J’s AI predicts court outcomes of tax scenarios with a reported 90% accuracy. Core Platform Predicts Outcomes. The platform tells you the confidence level of its prediction.).
On August 15, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a remarkable and scary decision limiting the rights of US citizens coming back into the country. The Holding The Court held that even though the DHS would not agree to delete the data they kept, Malik had standing to assert a claim to force DHS to delete the material.
Between 1992 and 2014, the rate of malpractice claims paid on behalf of physicians in the United States declined substantially ( National Center for Biotechnology Information ). Filing statistics: Nearly 400,000 personal injury claims are filed annually across the United States, predominantly in state courts ( U.S.
Mattathias Schwartz Two years after John Roberts’ confirmation as the Supreme Court’s chief justice in 2005, his wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, made a pivot. ” And life was indeed good for the Robertses, at least for the years 2007 to 2014. . “There are many paths to the good life,” she said.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
Summary of the Case: The Supreme Court, which had initially agreed to consider a circuit split on a privilege issue that commonly arises in discovery, reversed course and dismissed the writ of certiorari as “improvidently granted”—meaning the Supreme Court will not resolve the circuit split this term. In re Grand Jury , 23 F.4th
However, the Supreme Court has not established a clear standard for this scrutiny, leaving states to decide what level of review to apply. Department of Health and Human Services, The Health Consequences of Smoking-50 years of Progress, 21-23 (2014), [link]. Surgeon Gen.,
My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. ” Did that excuse garner sympathy from the court?
Working Party 29 (WP 29) describes the usage practices in Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques (noting common mistakes in using each method). What the Court decided: The Court indicated that pseudonymous data transferred to a data recipient is not considered personal data unless the data recipient can re-identify the data subjects.
These uploads have irritated Athos since 2014. The court outlines the plaintiff’s legal theory: because YouTube has automated software that scans videos to help users identify potentially infringing clips, Plaintiff’s DMCA notices imputed on YouTube knowledge of each and every single clip that infringed on a noticed film.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that the Illinois Supreme Court has appointed John K. In addition, the Court has reappointed Justice Mary Ellen Coghlan as a Commissioner and appointed two new Commissioners: Amanda J. Johnson serves on the Illinois Appellate Court First District.
This opinion should not surprise Oklahoma lawyers as it tracks the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court released in Oklahoma Bar Association v Weigel , 2014 OK 4 (2014) which provided clear guidance to Oklahoma lawyers. This includes flat and fixed fees.
While judges in state courts have been guided by codes of conduct going back over one hundred years, not every federal court in the United States has been operating under a code until recently. Federal judges at the district and circuit courts have been bound by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges since 1973.
before the US Court of Appeals for the Central District of California, it was a recently decided that a case is not per se exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § After Uniclass stopped making payments under a license agreement in 2009, ATEN sued Uniclass in 2014 for infringing two patents, seeking damages and an injunction.
Yesterday I did a blog post about that and noted it tracked the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court released in Oklahoma Bar Association v Weigel , 2014 OK 4 (2014). Prepaid legal fees and refundability of those fees was the subject of American Bar Association Formal Opinion 505.
Trademark owner lost a jury trial, allegedly because the court’s instructions to the jury about initial interest confusion were not favorable enough to the rightsowner. Whether to accept that belief as credible is for a jury to decide, not a matter of law for the Court, and summary judgment must be denied.” March 29, 2023).
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. 2014), amended by Doe v. Instagram, LLC , 2022 WL 17342198 (N.D. 30, 2022) * * * Appendix B: Cases Using the Phrase “Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card” Doe No. 3d 894 (9th Cir.
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. From there, she served as assistant attorney general of Arizona, on the Maricopa County Superior Court, and on the Arizona State Court of Appeals. Supreme Court, where she served for the next 25 years. We at IAALS are among the many saddened by the passing of U.S.
On August 15, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a remarkable and scary decision limiting the rights of US citizens coming back into the country. The Holding The Court held that even though the DHS would not agree to delete the data they kept, Malik had standing to assert a claim to force DHS to delete the material.
According to a “South Dakota Law Review” 2014 study, 20% of the country’s residents live in rural areas, but only 2% of attorneys practice in rural areas or small towns. Court navigators. The results are “legal oases,” said Patrick Goetzinger, former president of the South Dakota State Bar who helped create the program.
This focus on the cloud came to a head in the 2014 Brown v. While the bar likely took those learnings to heart, adapting to (and learning about) cloud storage solutions as they existed in 2014, recent developments in cloud architecture and record keeping may warrant a “return to class” for litigators as well as attorneys generally.
17] An example of this is seen in a 2014 deal struck by Gilead Sciences, the leading marketer of antiretrovirals used to treat HIV/AIDS. [18] 25] However, due to a 2013 Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. 1] One in four Americans report that they simply cannot afford to take their medication as prescribed. [2]
As a result, courts have recognized three types of liability for copyright infringement: direct infringement (“to do” any one of the five exclusive rights), contributory infringement (“to authorize” another to directly infringe) and vicarious liability (based on the relationship between the direct infringer and the person sought to be held liable).
Denton and published by the South Carolina Bar in 2014. S55 D46 2014. South Carolina is a comparative fault state, which means that your damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault the court attributes to your actions. You can find this print book in the law library, call number SC KFS 1990.S55 WHAT AM I ENTITLED TO?
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
Josh Blandi is the CEO and Co-Founder of UniCourt , a SaaS offering using machine learning to disrupt the way court data is organized, accessed, and used. With no real viable options for bulk access to court data available, we started building extractors to grab it from online public court portals.
Microsoft lost the case in 2014 , but won an appeal in 2016. Supreme Court heard argument on the case in February 2018. Supreme Court to drop the pending Microsoft litigation as moot, as the DOJ could (and did) alternatively use the CLOUD Act to issue a new warrant for the data held by Microsoft in Dublin.
Tepper’s career has included service as an assistant district attorney in North Carolina and in court administration at the Superior Court of Delaware. Nelson was the President of the Virginia State Bar June 2013-June 2014, and is a Past President of the Fairfax Law Foundation, and a Past President of the Fairfax Bar Association.
My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. Did that excuse garner sympathy from the court?
Bonn Regional Court slashes Telco’s €9.55 On 11 November, the Regional Court of Bonn slashed telco 1&1’s fine for various GDPR violations from €9.55 The large reductions highlight the potential value of challenging penalties, either directly with DPAs or through the courts. million fine by over 90%.
GANs were first introduced in 2014, consisting of several networks working together to produce synthetic data that closely resembles the real thing. The courts have interpreted the Lanham Act to support cases involving the nonconsensual use of a person’s “voice” or “persona” in this manner.
So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content