This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. The crowdsourcing concept did not work out.
In the cases since that have interpreted and applied the duty, lawyers’ claims of ignorance of technology have never helped them avoid sanctions. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. I mean, it’s not like the Internet lacks for free sources of caselaw.
gross domestic product, according to a 2014 report by the Center for Responsible Enterprise and Trade and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Yet a 2017 study by law firm Baker McKenzie found that less than a third of companies maintain inventories of trade secrets and have action plans for responding to theft.
Yesterday I did a blog post about that and noted it tracked the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court released in Oklahoma Bar Association v Weigel , 2014 OK 4 (2014). Prepaid legal fees and refundability of those fees was the subject of American Bar Association Formal Opinion 505.
These uploads have irritated Athos since 2014. Indeed, these claims have all been repeatedly rejected by applicable caselaw BUT. Athos owns the copyrights to many classic Mexican films. Users regularly upload its film clips to YouTube.
After Uniclass stopped making payments under a license agreement in 2009, ATEN sued Uniclass in 2014 for infringing two patents, seeking damages and an injunction. ATEN and Uniclass sell competing switch systems that allow a user to control multiple computers from a single keyboard.
gross domestic product, according to a 2014 report by the Center for Responsible Enterprise and Trade and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Yet a 2017 study by law firm Baker McKenzie found that less than a third of companies maintain inventories of trade secrets and have action plans for responding to theft.
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. The crowdsourcing concept did not work out.
In the cases since that have interpreted and applied the duty, lawyers’ claims of ignorance of technology have never helped them avoid sanctions. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. I mean, it’s not like the Internet lacks for free sources of caselaw.
The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing caselaw on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. As a result, a rich body of caselaw has developed distinguishing direct liability from secondary liability. 431 (2014). Aereo , 573 U.S.
To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s caselaw concerning the fair-use doctrine. See Jessica Silbey, The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Intellectual Property (2014).
Suzi also points out the prospective client does not care about caselaw – it’s important to focus on what they do care about, which is meeting their needs and building a relationship with them. So I started doing that probably 2014, 2015. And that’s when my practice really exploded.
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. He works currently at TrueLaw, which helps law firms use AI to improve their operations and services. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. About the Author Adam Ziegler is a lawyer and software builder.
And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the caselaw discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. And give me the answer right up top right. So so it does language really well.
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. He works currently at TrueLaw, which helps law firms use AI to improve their operations and services. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. About the Author Adam Ziegler is a lawyer and software builder.
And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the caselaw discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. And give me the answer right up top right. So so it does language really well.
And then the change in January 2014. Two, his DACA pronouncements were responded to or translated as far as within the RCA tool to kind of create a hard line that any immigrant that entered the country after January 1, 2014, would be detained automatically without bond. That gets us into the second period.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content