Remove 2014 Remove Analytics Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

The Five Most Momentous Legal Tech Fails

Above the Law - Technology

It started in 2014 at the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. When the litigation analytics company Gavelytics shut down in 2022, it was a shock to almost everybody but the founder. ROSS Intelligence. Gavelytics.

article thumbnail

ROSS Cofounder Returns To Legal Tech with Startup Using AI To Surface Judges’ Decision-Making Patterns

Above the Law - Technology

” He distinguished Bench IQ from legal analytics companies such as Lex Machina or Pre/Dicta. ” Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said.

Judge 275
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Law Library of Babel: Exploring the Infinite Dimensions of Law and Technology

Colin S. Levy

As a representative from Lex Machina, a legal analytics company, took the stage, I had no idea that the journey I was about to embark upon would lead me to the very frontiers of human knowledge and understanding. Oxford University Press, 2014. Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions. Zahavi, Dan.

Law 116
article thumbnail

Josh Blandi

Colin S. Levy

UniCourt provides Legal Data as a Service (LDaaS) via our APIs to AmLaw 50 firms and Fortune 500 businesses for accessing normalized court data for business development and intelligence, analytics, machine learning models, process automation, background checks, investigations, and underwriting.

article thumbnail

ROSS Cofounder Returns To Legal Tech with Startup Using AI To Surface Judges’ Decision-Making Patterns

Legal Tech Monitor

He distinguished Bench IQ from legal analytics companies such as Lex Machina or Pre/Dicta. Lawyers tend to use traditional legal analytics products at the front end of a litigation, to help their clients determine whether it is worth investing in going forward with the case, he said. They’re descriptive rather than explanatory.

Judge 52
article thumbnail

vLex’s Damien Riehl on Examining vLex’s New Vincent AI (TGIR Ep. 227)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? That’s obviously good for litigators. And maybe I’m a litigator that wants to say that the other side has said that California applies. And we also have Spanish data.

Judge 130
article thumbnail

My 20 Most-Read Posts of 2022

LawSites

But this year, they seem to span the gamut of topics I cover, from analytics to artificial intelligence, from legal ethics to legal research, from new companies starting up to established companies shutting down, from products designed for litigation to products embroiled in litigation. Say What?