This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
4, 2021), the Massachusetts Supreme Court struck down Uber’s TOS because it wasn’t properly formed. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court blessed the TOS formation re-do in a 6-1 vote, so Uber’s patch worked from a legal standpoint and it gets to send this case to arbitration. In Kauders v. Uber Techs. ,
The court agrees with Microsoft. ’…the trial court was correct to grant summary judgment finding Microsoft immune from Mr. Mich. 2013 WL 664231 (E.D. 2013); O’Kroley v. Among other defendants, he sued Microsoft for Bing search results linking to the episode. Microsoft defended on Section 230 grounds.
Supreme Court ruled that admissions programs at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC”) and Harvard College violated the equal protection clause on the grounds that the consideration of race as a stand-alone criteria in admissions is a form of racial discrimination. M944 2013] Jessica A. Harvard , 3 the U.S. 181, 143 S.
After months of awaiting trial, Banks was urged to take a plea deal by his lawyer, who believed that he would be unable to win his case in court. Banks signed with the Atlanta Falcons on April 3rd, 2013. At just 17-years-old, Brian was being tried as an adult.
The court easily dismisses per Section 230: ICS Provider. Numerous courts have held Google is one. ” The court summarizes: “Google has immunity from her state law claims, as it cannot be held liable for search engine results showing a third party’s statement.” This court repeatedly cites the Kabbaj case.
“The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief.” Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2013 WL 12314399 (N.D.
After two trips to the 9th Circuit, a remand from the Supreme Court, and nearly six years of motions and posturing, the outcome of the litigation was a permanent injunction against hiQ, a win for LinkedIn, and insolvency for scraper hiQ Labs. The court dismissed the market division argument on the grounds that it was time barred.
Sneed III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and then practiced law (primarily bankruptcy law) with Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco from 1986-1991. After receiving her B.A., summa cum laude, from Rice University in 1982 and her J.D. from Stanford Law School in 1985, she clerked for the Honorable Joseph T.
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. Wells , 2013 WL 1010589 (E.D.N.C. March 14, 2013) Jones v. 12, 2013) J.S. Superior Ct. 28, 2011) Hare v. Richie, 2012 WL 3773116 (D. 29, 2012) Ascend Health Corp.
We’ve blogged some of his cases before ( 1 , 2 ), including the lower court ruling in this case. In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. ” The district court granted summary judgment to IJR. Nature of Use.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
A Stanford Law School graduate, where he was president of the Stanford Law Review, Heller founded Casetext in 2013 after stints clerking for 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Boudin and as an associate at law firm Ropes & Gray.
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. Why Even Do This Project?
on March 8, 2013, and what it meant to the authors and to the broader movement for innovation in law. Watching the 2013 presentations about disruption of legal services might not be very shocking, because the format, the presentation, and the topics have become so widely adopted that they seem like they have always been around.
While judges in state courts have been guided by codes of conduct going back over one hundred years, not every federal court in the United States has been operating under a code until recently. Federal judges at the district and circuit courts have been bound by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges since 1973.
But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. At the circuit court level, the law of copyright preemption of contracts is a circuit split-plus, with at least two and as many as four differentiating positions on what might constitute preemption. 2d 426, 433 (8th Cir.1993)
on March 8, 2013, and what it meant to the authors and to the broader movement for innovation in law. Watching the 2013 presentations about disruption of legal services might not be very shocking, because the format, the presentation, and the topics have become so widely adopted that they seem like they have always been around.
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the Article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the Article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the Article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the Article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively. Read the article: Here
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively.
Since 2013, it has courted the legal industry in response to Dropbox’s predominance. Box For Lawyers User Guide Box is an online file collaboration system where you can create, edit, and store documents, and it wants lawyers as users. Here is what you need to know to use Box effectively.
Since passing the bar in 2013, DeBarros has built a six-figure law firm that focuses on sports and entertainment and has been featured in the news and on numerous podcasts. Are you going to take the initiative and schedule your court dates or client meetings? SL DeBarros Law Firm. Woodstock, IL.
First published by the American Bar Association in 2013, and with occasional updates in the years since, the book is now out in a new edition , published by O’Connor in partnership with Nextpoint , the e-discovery and litigation support company. .
Speakers at the reception included Justice Rena Van Tine, Illinois First District Appellate Court; Elsa Andrianifahanana, Partner at Jones Day; Martin Sinclair, Chair of the Commission on Professionalism; and Erika Harold, Executive Director of the Commission on Professionalism. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Roberta Tepper Roberta Tepper has been the lawyer assistance programs director at the State Bar of Arizona since 2013. Tepper’s career has included service as an assistant district attorney in North Carolina and in court administration at the Superior Court of Delaware. Nelson, Esq.
The first attempted creation of a Bitcoin exchange traded-fund (“ETF”), which is similar to an ETP, came in 2013, when Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss first proposed a Bitcoin ETF to the SEC, which was rejected. However, in 2023, the U.S.
After the first year, I wanted to compete to join a law journal and Moot Court. I joined Resolved and Moot Court. Moot Court implemented a new required course for brief writing and oral argument. Law Library Research Fellow Resolved Law Journal Member Moot Court Advocacy Board Member Charleston School of Law
Most recently, on March 2, the new managers at FTX told the Delaware bankruptcy court they had identified a deficit of $8.9 federal appeals court. The cases are largely filed in Delaware bankruptcy court, but actions have been filed in state and federal courts nationwide. Jenkins founded Law Street Media in 2013.
First published by the American Bar Association in 2013, and with occasional updates in the years since, the book is now out in a new edition , published by O’Connor in partnership with Nextpoint , the e-discovery and litigation support company.
Analytics in legal research provided dramatic new insights into the behavior of judges, courts, attorneys and clients. It took less than ten years following the launch of Lex Machina in 2013 for legal analytics to move from esoteric to essential. At the end of the day – hallucinated cases while a risk – also has a remedy.
Because of this, it has fallen to the courts to determine how the ADA applies to websites. The courts have looked to Title III of the ADA, which requires that every owner, lessor, or operator of a “place of public accommodation” provide equal access to users who meet the ADA’s standards for disability.
Bonn Regional Court slashes Telco’s €9.55 On 11 November, the Regional Court of Bonn slashed telco 1&1’s fine for various GDPR violations from €9.55 The large reductions highlight the potential value of challenging penalties, either directly with DPAs or through the courts. million fine by over 90%.
And I hope that other things that rely on systemic knowledge that don't generate value beyond navigating inefficient systems like filling in complex court forms will also become simpler. You have been writing a column for Slaw, Canada's online legal magazine, since 2013.
The Patient Choice and Control at End of Life Act , passed in 2013, allows terminally ill patients to request medication to end their lives. While legal challenges to physician-assisted suicide have occurred, Courts in states where it is legal have upheld the right to physician-assisted suicide under certain circumstances.
Analytics in legal research provided dramatic new insights into the behavior of judges, courts, attorneys and clients. It took less than ten years following the launch of Lex Machina in 2013 for legal analytics to move from esoteric to essential. At the end of the day – hallucinated cases while a risk – also has a remedy.
25] However, due to a 2013 Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. 27] Under this reasoning, the court found that Gilead’s 2014 patent deal with Teva did not violate antitrust laws. [28] 27] Under this reasoning, the court found that Gilead’s 2014 patent deal with Teva did not violate antitrust laws. [28]
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
I worked on questions from the Parliament on information technology and played an important role in Supreme Court cases on IT. The primary focus is on real money games, particularly skill-based games, as various courts across the country have recognized the legitimacy of skill games. How did you start working on online gaming laws?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content