This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In short, lawyers must observe their long-standing ethical obligation to preserve client confidence and conduct duediligence into any service or vendor used to store client information. Other states describe a lawyer’s duty when choosing SaaS and cloud computing services as one of “duediligence.”
Great news for business efficiency, but is it bad news for those charged with collecting data for litigation, investigations, and compliance? It is now the norm to have meetings held virtually, use instant messaging to communicate with clients and colleagues, and rely on cloud hosting platforms for data storage and sharing.
Compliance for OGIs under the Amendment 1. Therefore, compliance for OGIs may be challenging, without a clear uniform understanding on what may be considered detrimental. Candy Crush) may be considered harmful and be subjected to compliances under the Amendment. This is less than the 72 hours given to other intermediaries. [29]
In this Debevoise Data Blog post, we outline key provisions of the Act’s new reporting requirements, and what companies should consider now in order to ensure future compliance in the event of a notifiable cybersecurity incident or ransomware attack where a ransom might be paid. Expanding Federal Cybersecurity Enforcement.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content