Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 26, 2023

28, 2020): There are facts from which a jury could determine that Defendants created and/or developed website content making the immunity under Section 230 of the CDA inapplicable and thus summary judgment is not appropriate. There is evidence Defendants’ conduct exceeded standard publication decisions. ” * Doe v.

Defendant 98

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Lawsuit 98

Eric Goldman

AUGUST 11, 2023

August 9, 2023) This case involves StubHub’s obligations to provide refunds due to COVID cancellations. The district court said that the buyers who made their purchases on the website had to go to arbitration, but the buyers who made their purchases on their mobile devices could stay in court. Citing Sellers v. The court sees it differently.

e-records 98

e-records Court Law Law 98

Attorney at Work

JUNE 23, 2022

My first knowledge that a complaint had been filed came by certified letter in 2012 — six years later — from the Iowa Supreme Court Client Security Board, which is charged with policing the professional interactions of Iowa’s 7,500 attorneys. Unfortunately, that’s something I know from personal experience. The State Bar Complaint Arrives.

Failure-to-appear 125

Failure-to-appear Attorney Defendant Lawyer 125

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 22, 2024

The court recaps past cases: the crux of the financial benefit inquiry is whether a causal relationship exists between the infringing activity and a financial benefit to the defendant. But in every case, the financial benefit to the defendant must flow directly from the third party’s acts of infringement to establish vicarious liability.

Defendant 119

Defendant Court Failure-to-appear Lawsuit 119