2012 Court e-records 
LawSites
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. . A reminder that we are on Patreon.
LawSites
MARCH 19, 2024
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California court filing, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. InfoTrack may be one of the fastest growing yet least known legal technology companies in the United States.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Eric Goldman
MAY 15, 2024
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.
LawNext podcast
MARCH 18, 2024
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California court filing, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. InfoTrack may be one of the fastest growing yet least known legal technology companies in the United States.
Eric Goldman
AUGUST 11, 2023
Two top-line takeaways you might get from this post: A two-click formation process avoids the risk of judges moving the goalposts about formation, and If you are amending your TOS, have an airtight plan for building a credible evidentiary record. The court sees it differently. In re: StubHub Refund Litigation , No. 22-15879 (9th Cir.
LawNext podcast
AUGUST 31, 2021
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. A reminder that we are on Patreon.
Joshua Gilliland
JANUARY 7, 2016
The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
118 
Let's personalize your content