article thumbnail

Supreme Court Justice Ann Timmer on Arizona’s Sweeping Regulatory Reforms

LawSites

In ordering that change, as well as a package of additional reforms, the Arizona Supreme Court acted on the recommendations of a task force that had called for fundamental changes in the regulation of legal services, all with the goal of enhancing access to justice. Justice Timmer was appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court in 2012.

Court 136
article thumbnail

Nike vs. Lululemon: The Battle Over Flyknit Technology

Brett Trout

Nikes Flyknit technology revolutionized the sneaker industry when it debuted in 2012 with the Flyknit Racer. Skechers (2016) Nike took Skechers to court for allegedly infringing eight Nike patents, including patents covering the Flyknit technology. What is Flyknit Technology? The case was settled in 2022.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

4 Hispanic Lawyers Who Are Leading Historic Change in Law

Legal Talk Network

This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.

article thumbnail

LawNext: PacerPro Founder and CEO Gavin McGrane On Process Automation and Court Data

LawSites

Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. .

Court 118
article thumbnail

District court finds no duty owed to copyright holders for unsecured wireless network owners

Cyber Crime Review

2012), the court held that a person owes no duty in securing their wireless network to a copyright holder whose works are illegally downloaded over the network. ” The district court held that Hatfield had no duty to AF Holdings. The court also found that the claim is preempted under the Copyright Act.

Court 100
article thumbnail

Like a Bad Penny, Congressional Attempts to Legalize Site-Blocking Have Returned

Brett Trout

2012 moment marked a powerful public rejection of government-mandated internet censorship. History Shows Weve Been Here Before In 2012, the internet community rose up against SOPA and PIPA. Giving courts and corporations the power to block websiteseven foreign onessets a precedent that can, and will, be expanded, abused, and exported.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Immunizes Bing’s Search Results–White v. Microsoft

Eric Goldman

The court agrees with Microsoft. ’…the trial court was correct to grant summary judgment finding Microsoft immune from Mr. Pataki, 514 F. 2012 WL 4863696 (D. 2012); Merritt v. Lexis Nexis, 2012 WL 6725882 (E.D. 2012); Nieman v. 2012 WL 3201931 (C.D. 2012); Getachew v. Google, Inc.,