This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It was acquired in 2011 by Internet Brands and made part of the Martindale Legal Marketing Network. Business profile: Includes Enhanced plus a custom profile page with images/video, customer testimonial, and personalized content.
In litigation and intellectualproperty matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals.
This brings up a myriad of intellectualproperty concerns. User companies can also insist on indemnification for intellectualproperty infringements in case the AI tool is not trained on licensed data. 185 (2011) DLT 346 [18] [link] ; Perfect 10, Inc. Is the output of AI tools copyrightable? GitHub, Inc. [16]
2011) (citing to ProCD in rejecting preemption in the context of a Desny claim). If content or data is not kept beneath a log-in (and thus entitled to protection via the CFAA and most state computer-trespass laws), it should be protectible only insofar as it is subject to existing intellectualproperty laws. (To Zeidenberg.
We keep about this, you know, a roundabout but a logical way when we will get it historically, I’ve been working in legal information and tech since 2011. And what, you know, I don’t want to take any intellectualproperty from you. I was CEO at kami Canadian legal information Institute. Greg Lambert 22:21 Yeah.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content