This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Marc Andreessen quipped in 2011: “Software is eating the world”. The legal profession is not immune from this development. In a large sense, law is information or as Bill Palin, the young lawyer who won the ABA’s Legal Hackathon at last year’s ABA Annual Meeting , says, “law is code”. Law has a high information component.
Back in 2011, Chris Gierymski, director of docketing at DLA Piper in Chicago, reached out to a lot of different people through various email distribution groups. We don’t provide legaladvice, even if we’re lawyers. Those attorneys, they want to hear what they want to hear. We do the research.
In 2011, I was associate dean of the faculty here at the University of Toronto, it was in the context of leading review of the curriculum, the first year curriculum that I got really interested in thinking about the future of legal education. We’d love to hear from you. And, and as an academic, my focus is tax law.
In 2011, I was associate dean of the faculty here at the University of Toronto, it was in the context of leading review of the curriculum, the first year curriculum that I got really interested in thinking about the future of legal education. We’d love to hear from you. And, and as an academic, my focus is tax law.
It was piloted in 2011–2012. These are individuals if they have a credible claim for relief from removal, they have every reason to show up in immigration court for their hearings, these are the things that a risk tool, ostensibly measures. The information presented here does not constitute legaladvice.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content