This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Since 2011, Fastcase has released an annual list of the Fastcase 50, honoring 50 of the law’s “smartest, most courageous, innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders.” I was honored to be in the inaugural Fastcase 50 class in 2011. This year’s list of honorees reflects a year of transformation for legal services.
Each year since the inaugural awards in 2011, the Fastcase 50 award has spotlighted the often under-recognized efforts of pioneers and architects of the future of law and legal technology,” Fastcase said in announcing this latest round. Disclosure: I was listed in the inaugural group in 2011.). California Supreme Court.
In 2011, LexisNexis leapt onto this bandwagon with its release of Firm Manager , a web-based practice management platform designed for smaller law firms. The year 2008 saw the launches of the first two cloud-based law practice management platforms, Clio and Rocket Matter, followed in 2009 by the launch of MyCase.
Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the social media accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM.
In what I would call a very significant case, a New York federal court has held that failure to examine a defendant’s imaged hard drive within 15-months after it was obtained was an unlawful seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Metter , 2011 U.S. In United States v. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y.
The court denies a preliminary injunction. Though the court says it’s a close question, the court says that the plaintiff does not have a likelihood of success on the merits. To analyze this, the court applies the standard likelihood of consumer confusion factors. ” Product line expansion. Not relevant.
To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases. The data the Journal used was compiled by the Free Law Project , a non-profit that works to provide free and open public access to court data, opinions, filings and other information.
O’Neil who, since 2011, has been the presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court. As for the CIA’s part, they were actively recruiting paralegals from the conference to be in the Office of General Counsel which is responsible for advising the director of the CIA.
Jones , the ground-breaking decision from the Supreme Court in January? However, only the GPS data was used at trial so the appellate courts were never able to directly address the CSLI. ” Courts began to deal with CSLI about five years ago, and as they were with GPS data, the courts are fractured.
Supreme Court ruled that admissions programs at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC”) and Harvard College violated the equal protection clause on the grounds that the consideration of race as a stand-alone criteria in admissions is a form of racial discrimination. M94 2011] What if I say the wrong thing?: 181, 143 S.
With a doctorate in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley, Shankar founded Everlaw in 2011 as one of the earliest cloud-based e-discovery platforms. Steno , reliable court reporting with a revolutionary approach If you enjoy listening to LawNext, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.
However, the Supreme Court has not established a clear standard for this scrutiny, leaving states to decide what level of review to apply. Gun regulation remains a highly debated issue, with a large portion of the public opposing stricter regulations for fear that it may infringe upon the rights granted by the Second Amendment.
On the other hand, courts have held that there is no property right in child pornography so the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply ( United States v. Therefore, PhotoDNA may violate the Fourth Amendment in jurisdictions adopting the Warshak logic of the Sixth Circuit as the NCMEC exception would be unconstitutional. Hicks, 438 Fed.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. 2011 WL 1675043 (N.C. 28, 2011) Hare v. Roommates.Com, LLC , 521 F.3d 3d 1157 (9th Cir. April 3, 2008) Milo v. Martin , 311 S.W.3d 3d 210 (Tex. April 29, 2010) Hill v.
The district court didn’t act on the motions, which acted as a pocket denial. The appeals court reverses, dismisses Hah’s lawsuits, and orders Hah to pay the defendants’ attorneys’ fees. The appeals court says that the contract damages allegation was conclusory and insufficient, so that claim fails too.
It includes thousandes of court documents, newspaper articles, and more. An appeal by the prosecution to re-open the case in order to impose harsher sentences was rejected by the Supreme Court of India in May 2011. After over twenty five years of litigation in both the U.S.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
Fifteen years ago, courts generally avoided categorical pronouncements about the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising. Courts almost never found trademark infringement in those cases, but it was only in the last decade that we started to get opinions saying this bluntly and clearly. Google (2d Circuit) and Rosetta Stone v.
The Delaware court stayed proceedings pending the California action. First, the court found that there was no evidence of logged-in scraping in the record. 4, 2011)) (emphasis in original). The court’s reasoning was that the survival clause did not have a reasonable restriction or termination date. signif[ies] that you.
Supreme Court TransUnion decision. On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a significant opinion on standing in the context of consumer class actions in TransUnion LLC v. The Supreme Court affirmed that certain members of a class action lacked standing—and therefore could not be members of the class. The Opinion.
The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal Resources About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. Table of contents What Are Lawyer Flat Fees? The Reasonableness of a Fee When Are Legal Fees Earned? Are Fees Refundable? What Are Lawyer Flat Fees?
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. I don’t care.
Arizona In 2020, the Arizona Supreme Court adopted changes to the state legal ethics rules which eliminated Rule 5.4. In 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court granted an ABS license to the company Elevate, making it the first entity to hold ABS licenses in both the UK and the U.S. United Kingdom. legal industry.
But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. At the circuit court level, the law of copyright preemption of contracts is a circuit split-plus, with at least two and as many as four differentiating positions on what might constitute preemption. 2d 426, 433 (8th Cir.1993)
Courts : This is hard to compare given the multiple US jurisdictions. But UK government is way ahead with a major court reform program underway, backed by $1b in government funding. Richard cites difference in how Supreme Courts reacted. US legal ops may push US firms to change faster. At minimum,the US is more patch.
Overview In a much anticipated decision, the UK Supreme Court has unanimously decided that a mass claim brought against Google by Mr Richard Lloyd, on behalf of a class that could include as many as 4.4 million iPhone users (the “iPhone Users”), cannot proceed, as currently constituted, as a ‘representative action’ in the English courts.
This statute has been interpreted by the courts to mean that (1) written description and (2) enablement are, “two separate requirements that valid patents must fulfill,” to satisfy the specification of a patent application. [4] In 2011, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. Abbott Laboratories narrowed the antibody exception. [19]
When it did, Aderant already had a leading rules-based calendaring product of its own, CompuLaw , which it acquired in 2011, and which originally was introduced to the legal market some 40 years ago. DMS integration with iManage and NetDocuments, so that court documents are automatically stored in the correct client/matter folder.
This includes big and small law firms, bar associations, government offices, court districts, corporations, and law schools. I have supervised the Lawyer-to-Lawyer Mentoring Program at UIC Law School, formerly The John Marshall Law School, since its inception in October 2011. What are the benefits you’ve seen in mentors and mentees?
He led the team of lawyers and research analysts and helped develop AI-informed predictive tools, which predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations. The most notable of which for my own work was the AI informed predictive tools helping to predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that Chief Counsel Mark C. Created in 2011, the Fastcase 50 highlights the contributions of “the top 50 most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders in the legal industry.” Palmer has been named to the 2023 Fastcase 50.
Code sections 15-51-20 through 15-51-60 address who can bring the action, how damages can be determined, the effects of illegitimacy, and advises all damage awards must be approved by the courts. H82 2011 and Lexis. Interestingly, this title also provides the basis for civil liability for lynching but only the county’s liability.
Process for updating the bar exam The UBE was initially launched in 2011 to test aspiring lawyers on the “knowledge and skills” they should be able to demonstrate before becoming licensed, according to the NCBE. Some states have communicated that they are going their own way and are instituting or exploring alternatives to the bar exam.
Since 2011, Fastcase has released an annual list of the Fastcase 50, honoring 50 of the law’s “smartest, most courageous, innovators, techies, visionaries, and leaders.” I was honored to be in the inaugural Fastcase 50 class in 2011. This year’s list of honorees reflects a year of transformation for legal services.
I built a document automation app online to help people fight their tickets for free using a recent court decision that had come down in Manhattan. There were two other court decisions from just outside of the city that were persuasive as well. He’s an attorney licensed to practice in California since 2011. Read it here.
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
Criminal enforcement action for unlawfully accessing personal data: A former employee of Enterprise Rent-A-Car was fined £10,000 by a UK criminal court for unlawfully accessing personal data. Businesses might consider using this case as a reminder to employees of the potential criminal sanctions for data protection-related misconduct.
We keep about this, you know, a roundabout but a logical way when we will get it historically, I’ve been working in legal information and tech since 2011. So you can imagine if you’re reading a court opinion, and it cites 10, more court opinions, you run the risk of opening many, many, many tabs.
The term “person” has also been interpreted conservatively by the Courts in respect of copyright law. In 2019, the Delhi High Court rejected a copyright claim over a list compiled by a computer, on the grounds of, inter alia, lack of human intervention. [8] Few of the cases are discussed below.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
US Federal Circuit Court web page showing a best viewed in for a web browser released in 2011 and that reached end of life in 2016 and will reach end of support in 2024. It has been some time since you would visit a web page – at least I hope it has been some time – and seen a warning “Best viewed in Internet Explorer 6 or Netscape 5”.
He led the team of lawyers and research analysts and helped develop AI-informed predictive tools, which predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations. The most notable of which for my own work was the AI informed predictive tools helping to predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content