Remove 2010 Remove e-discovery Remove e-records
article thumbnail

Is this the Fastest Document Search in Legal?

LawSites

A product launched this week claims to be the fastest search and review platform in legal for matters involving large document collections — discovery, investigations and compliance — and the first to seamlessly combine keyword and algorithmic search. While these claims might seem audacious, they come from a team with a proven track record.

article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.” The court-appointed the SBA as a receiver and permitted it to marshal Cardinal’s assets and business records. In United States v. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,

article thumbnail

Don’t Be Late and Ineffective with Litigation Holds

Joshua Gilliland

The Court found that the duty to preserve was the date of an earlier lawsuit involving quota-related allegations that was “strikingly similar” to the instant case, which was January 31, 2008, opposed to the date of the current lawsuit, filed on May 25, 2010. The Court applied the elements from Chin v. Stinson , at *10-11, referencing Floyd v.