This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Since 2010, the nonprofit Free Law Project has been working to make the legal ecosystem more equitable and competitive using technology, data and advocacy.
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
Dean Whalen, Chief Legal Officer of Readback, a new AI-assisted deposition court reporting platform, explains how AI-assisted court reporting addresses the stenographer talent crunch — with added benefits. By 2010, however, the video rental giant would accrue over $1 billion in losses and file for bankruptcy.
Clayton County case , where the Supreme Court affirmed sexual orientation and gender identity cannot be discriminated against in the workplace. Lawyers, in particular, have played a critical role in solidifying and protecting rights, like in the landmark Bostock v. overseeing well-being initiatives for more than 1,000 attorneys.
When it launched, I questioned in an Above the Law column whether it was a case of Clearspire déjà vu, recalling the demise of the strikingly similar dual-entity firm Clearspire, which opened in 2010 and shut down four years later. There is, however, a somewhat happy ending to the story of Gavelytics.
Pittsburgh School of Law, US The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thursday upheld the funding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as constitutional. The court found the CFPB is funded by Title X of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Sean Beeghly | U.
To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases. The data the Journal used was compiled by the Free Law Project , a non-profit that works to provide free and open public access to court data, opinions, filings and other information.
Jones , the ground-breaking decision from the Supreme Court in January? However, only the GPS data was used at trial so the appellate courts were never able to directly address the CSLI. ” Courts began to deal with CSLI about five years ago, and as they were with GPS data, the courts are fractured.
The court takes two elements off the table immediately: “Plaintiffs do not contest that MMA was a user of an interactive computer service, nor that MMA received the Kane Email from another information content provider.” Pham (pretty much directly on point…and from 2010) and Barrett v. Rosenthal (from 2006!).
They secured a patent in 2010, covering a novel ice-resurfacing machine. Although he appealed the expiry, the appellate court denied his appeal, finding that Taillefer not having a backup system for receiving emails regarding the maintenance fee payments was an accident waiting to happen.
2023 Taylor Swift’s fans, affectionately called Swifties, closed out 2022 with an antitrust complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Ticketmaster, the online ticketing giant. In 2010, Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation to become Live Nation Entertainment. By Shabrina Defi Khansa, LL.M. 15 U.S.C. §
The court summarizes: “Meta claims that it raised issues with Plaintiffs, including “nominative fair use,” “commentary,” and “the un-likelihood of confusion based on the appearance of the marks in the actual marketplace, as they will be encountered by consumers.”” eBay , but in a confusing way.
Started in 2010, Free Law Project is the leading 501(c)(3) nonprofit using software, data, and advocacy to make the legal ecosystem more equitable and competitive. Bots.law — A collection of bots that help attorneys, journalists and the public keep up with court cases. Read More…
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Access to Justice (ATJ Commission) announced that it is accepting nominations for two awards: the Thomas L. This award honors Justice Kilbride, who was elected to the Illinois Supreme Court in 2000 and chosen as Chief Justice by his colleagues in 2010. Colman Access to Justice Award.
Every year since 2010, I have compiled a list of my most-popular posts. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
2023 Taylor Swift’s fans, affectionately called Swifties, closed out 2022 with an antitrust complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Ticketmaster, the online ticketing giant. In 2010, Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation to become Live Nation Entertainment. By Shabrina Defi Khansa, LL.M. 15 U.S.C. §
” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
While judges in state courts have been guided by codes of conduct going back over one hundred years, not every federal court in the United States has been operating under a code until recently. Federal judges at the district and circuit courts have been bound by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges since 1973.
Smokeball was founded in 2010 and has been adding useful features for law firms ever since. Smokeball includes over 20,000 court forms out of the box – that’s a lot; and, Smokeball will build out additional forms based on user requests while also working separately to add to its existing collection.
Supreme Court justice and then long hours as a Big Law litigator. In 2010, Chris threw out his own shingle and founded an entertainment law practice. Chris’ career path started with a clerkship for a future U.S. That’s because the world of entertainment law and independent film production was calling him.
Since 2010, the nonprofit Free Law Project has been working to make the legal ecosystem more equitable and competitive using technology, data and advocacy. We appreciate their support and hope you will check them out.
McCormack , former chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, who took over in February as the AAA’s president and CEO. In her former role as chief justice, McCormack had been a leading voice on modernizing the court and justice systems to expand access to justice. I am thrilled to be a part of that transformation and program.”
McCormack , former chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, who took over in February as the AAA’s president and CEO. In her former role as chief justice, McCormack had been a leading voice on modernizing the court and justice systems to expand access to justice.
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. April 29, 2010) Hill v. Roommates.Com, LLC , 521 F.3d 3d 1157 (9th Cir. April 3, 2008) Milo v. Martin , 311 S.W.3d 3d 210 (Tex. StubHub , Inc., 2011 WL 1675043 (N.C. Superior Ct.
Producing Party agreed to produce the ESI during a teleconference and a Court ordered was then entered. The Producing Party sought a modification of the Court order to not include metadata, claiming the Requesting Party did not originally request the associated metadata. The Court AGREED with the Producing Party. McSparran v.
The integration is between Docket Alarm , a Fastcase -owned product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case-prediction analytics, and Courtroom Insight , a knowledge management platform that captures key information about expert witnesses, arbitrators, judges and attorneys.
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. From there, she served as assistant attorney general of Arizona, on the Maricopa County Superior Court, and on the Arizona State Court of Appeals. Supreme Court, where she served for the next 25 years. We at IAALS are among the many saddened by the passing of U.S.
The Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., The Supreme Court ordered two factually similar cases consolidated, Loper Bright Enterprises v. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine the future of Chevron. 4] The second step applies when the court cannot clearly discern the meaning of the statute.
This guidance was extensive and addressed many different issues including technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor about AI usage with legal clients and courts. However, as highlighted by the Louisiana Supreme Court’s recent letter (online: [link] while this guidance is helpful, it may be unnecessary.
Every year since 2010, I have compiled a list of my most-popular posts. For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.
I will say this in 20102010. Yeah, a lot of courts there are a lot of there’s just a lot of adoption that’s required for something like that. And I don’t think it will be mature in two or three, but probably even more than we anticipate in 10. It’s just, just a it’s just a hunch I could I could be completely wrong.
Issues addressed included technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor, both with legal clients and courts. COPRAC further emphasized the importance of full candor with courts and clients. The guidance provided by COPRAC was extensive, addressing many different ethical issues.
Starr of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a standing order in April requiring lawyers to certify that generative AI tools were not used to assist with drafting any papers filed with the court. Similarly, U.S. She also co-authors “Criminal Law in New York,” a Thomson Reuters treatise.
The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective.
E47 2010 vol. E47 2010 vol. Law Library Research Fellow Moot Court Advocacy Board Judicial Board Member Bradley Wendel, Professional Responsibility Examples and Explanations , 5th ed. Call Number: KF306.W46 Steven Emanuel, Law in a Flash , Flash Cards Part 1 and Part 2. Call Numbers: KF306.E47 Part 1; KF306.E47
This was followed by Florida, which issued Ethics Opinion 24-1 on January 19th, and the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts preliminary guidelines handed down on January 24th. The State Bar of California was first when it released guidance in November 2023. Client consent was also addressed.
On 27 September 2021, the Commission’s previous decisions establishing model standard contractual clauses, namely Decision 2001/497/EC and Decision 2010/87/EU, expired. The new standard contractual clauses contain more detailed provisions than previous versions of the clauses, and some optional decisions.
One immediate effect of this deeper-level integration will be that court rules banning AI-generated documents will quickly become outdated and impractical, in part because they could effectively prohibit lawyers from using essential technology altogether. She also co-authors “Criminal Law in New York,” a Thomson Reuters treatise.
As I discussed in another article, the guidance provided was extensive and covered many different ethical issues including technology competence, confidentiality, and the requirement of candor, both with legal clients and courts. She also co-authors “Criminal Law in New York,” a Thomson Reuters treatise.
The authors examined abstracts in PubMed from 2010-24 and found that there was an “unprecedented increase in excess style words” in recent scholarship which they attribute to ChatGPT usage. You can also ask it to put it in the tone of a specific Supreme Court Justice or well-known author.
It’s not just AI and lawyers like Schwart and LoDuca in Federal court. Artificial Intelligence: Guidance for Judicial Office Holders , UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, December 12, 2023, p. CanLII had one case from 2010. Does the lawyer understand the tool they are using? It’s a UK case that’s cited in US law.
Along with this increased social media use, rates of mental health issues among children have been surging since 2010. By 2018, suicide officially became the “ second leading cause of death for youths.”
These rules may change with the emergence of new legislation or court cases. Some states prohibit surcharging entirely: Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, and Puerto Rico. Set the proper amount According to the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, merchants can only charge a surcharge that covers the cost of accepting credit card payments, not more.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content