This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Or it received a data request from a consumer under the GDPR or California Consumer Privacy Act. Who covers the expense in responding to it? Gillis , 755 F.
A product launched this week claims to be the fastest search and review platform in legal for matters involving large document collections — discovery, investigations and compliance — and the first to seamlessly combine keyword and algorithmic search. Disclosure: I was a paid consultant to Catalyst from 2010 to 2017.].
The City was found to be grossly negligent in issuing and executing its litigation hold for the preservation of email and text messages. The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective. 2, 2016) 2016 U.S.
In her current role, Katie focuses on leveraging technology like AI to improve the litigation process for lawyers. Their product suite now covers the entire litigation lifecycle, from intake to discovery to case management. The hosts also introduced Kristin Zmrhal, who has over 20 years of experience in the legal tech space.
Jump ahead another 5 years, it’s now 2010. These alerts could potently be used to detect patterns and trends in certain types of litigation. Compliance: Track the technology's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including data privacy and security.
In her current role, Katie focuses on leveraging technology like AI to improve the litigation process for lawyers. Their product suite now covers the entire litigation lifecycle, from intake to discovery to case management. The hosts also introduced Kristin Zmrhal, who has over 20 years of experience in the legal tech space.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content