Remove 2010 Remove Compliance Remove e-records
article thumbnail

Is this the Fastest Document Search in Legal?

LawSites

A product launched this week claims to be the fastest search and review platform in legal for matters involving large document collections — discovery, investigations and compliance — and the first to seamlessly combine keyword and algorithmic search. While these claims might seem audacious, they come from a team with a proven track record.

article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. ” If the subpoena is issued in a state court matter, a state statute or court rule may shift the costs of subpoena compliance to the requesting party (see below).

article thumbnail

Don’t Be Late and Ineffective with Litigation Holds

Joshua Gilliland

The Court found that the duty to preserve was the date of an earlier lawsuit involving quota-related allegations that was “strikingly similar” to the instant case, which was January 31, 2008, opposed to the date of the current lawsuit, filed on May 25, 2010. The new Rule 37(e) states: Failure to Preserve Electronically Stored Information.