2010 Compliance e-discovery 
LawSites
FEBRUARY 25, 2022
A product launched this week claims to be the fastest search and review platform in legal for matters involving large document collections — discovery, investigations and compliance — and the first to seamlessly combine keyword and algorithmic search. Disclosure: I was a paid consultant to Catalyst from 2010 to 2017.].
Percipient
APRIL 22, 2023
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. 23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Percipient
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
For instance, the Alabama Disciplinary Commission , drawing guidance from Arizona and Nevada , concluded in Opinion 2010-02 that lawyer cloud computing and the use third parties to store client data is permissible “provided the attorney exercises reasonable care in doing so.”
Joshua Gilliland
JANUARY 7, 2016
The Court found that the duty to preserve was the date of an earlier lawsuit involving quota-related allegations that was “strikingly similar” to the instant case, which was January 31, 2008, opposed to the date of the current lawsuit, filed on May 25, 2010. Stinson , at *10-11, referencing Floyd v. City of New York, 283 F.R.D.
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
AUGUST 29, 2023
Their product suite now covers the entire litigation lifecycle, from intake to discovery to case management. So we started that back in about 2010. Kristin explained that DISCO’s vision is to create great legal technology that helps lawyers find evidence faster. And I did that for a number of years. Absolutely.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content