This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The year 2008 saw the launches of the first two cloud-based law practice management platforms, Clio and Rocket Matter, followed in 2009 by the launch of MyCase. When the litigation analytics company Gavelytics shut down in 2022, it was a shock to almost everybody but the founder. As of this writing, the lawsuit is ongoing. Gavelytics.
But after Autonomy gobbled up Interwoven in 2009 and then Hewlett Packard bought Autonomy in 2011, the deal turned into a disaster when allegations that Autonomy had inflated its value resulted in HP having to write off nearly $8.8 billion purchase price and years of litigation that continues even now. billion of the $11.1
Many reprints were available on earlier versions of the Litigation-Tech website. The archive is intended to preserve these older articles, which were written prior to the Court Technology and Trial Presentation blog, which I started writing in 2009. Things are different for writers now, in that you can click, and publish.
Enterprise systems with ESI) are now common in litigation and investigations. Established in 2009, Lineal specializes in comprehensive eDiscovery services, leveraging its proprietary technology suite, Amplify to enhance efficiency and accuracy in handling large volumes of electronic data.
The new law firm platform uses the same AI search technology that has been the core of ImageRights’ product for visual artists since 2009. “They have often asked if we could provide specialized searches for copyright infringement cases they were litigating or even just run a general search for one of their clients.
Paralegal Voice host Jill Francisco also talked about the new remote environment with her guest, litigator Marc Williams. The host and guests on Best’s Insurance Law Podcast explain it’s been around since 2009. Williams acknowledged that pre-pandemic, he would have shunned telecommuting, certainly as a full-time affair.
I started a small law firm in Detroit in 2009 with a friend of mine. Litigation for auto dealers in Detroit, corporate work for dentists in Chicago, and estate planning work for young families in Charlotte are all multimillion-dollar niche opportunities. When building a law practice, don’t try to serve everyone.
He has worked extensively with Fortune 500 corporations and ALM 100 law firms, helping them optimize their litigation spend through the strategic application of technology, process efficiency, and expert personnel. . __ About the Author Marco Nasca is an industry veteran with over 20 years of experience in eDiscovery and legal technology.
But in precisely that scenario, Amy Falcon , a litigation partner with Porter Hedges in Houston, says she was able to cut the cost of preparing the brief by 20%, and she attributes that savings entirely to the legal technology product, Clearbrief. “I So that was my first exposure to how antiquated the system was, and that was 2009.”.
. § 285 soley because (1) the cost of litigation exceeds plaintiff’s potential damages or (2) a party’s legal argument was rejected on summary judgment. After Uniclass stopped making payments under a license agreement in 2009, ATEN sued Uniclass in 2014 for infringing two patents, seeking damages and an injunction. . §
Seeber shares the origin story of Level Legal, starting from its humble beginnings in 2009 in East Texas, evolving from a document review team within a law firm to a full-service eDiscovery and forensics company based in Dallas. Joey Seeber 3:51 Level Legal started on the 20th of January 2009. But tell me about this little team.
since 2009, is designed to serve as a companion to the Practical Law services, providing in-depth coverage of transactional and compliance topics and key issues and developments in litigation practice and procedure. The transactional and litigation sections will each have featured articles written by outside experts.
Since its inception in 2009, Lineal has operated at the leading edge of digital forensics, cybersecurity, and eDiscovery technology for hundreds of law firms and Fortune 500 companies. For media inquiries, please contact: marketing@linealservices.com Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
Jennifer has been instrumental in providing cross-border eDiscovery consulting for complex litigation, dispute resolution, and regulatory investigations. Her multilingual capabilities in Mandarin, Cantonese, and English uniquely position her to support the diverse needs of the APAC region’s legal community.
In 2009, Autonomy acquired Interwoven for $775 million, and then in 2011 Hewlett Packard purchased Autonomy for $11.1 Unfortunately, for HP, the Autonomy acquisition turned into a fiasco due to alleged accounting improprieties by Autonomy, resulting in both litigation and a write-down of nearly $8.8 billion of the purchase price.
Uncover key data sooner with AI-generated summaries of key documents to inform early case assessment and review strategy and prioritization for investigations, litigation, and regulatory compliance matters. Verify the accuracy of results with linked document citations to documents within the client data set.
LinkedIn case, which up until now was the most important case in the history of US web-scraping litigation. The 2009 Facebook Terms included the following clause: “accessing or using our website. at 18 (quoting the 2009 version of the Terms at issue in Fteja v. He presided over the famous hiQ Labs v. signif[ies] that you.
“We know we are building innovative, powerful tech when a litigation powerhouse like Quinn Emanuel validates our offering,” said Lineal Partner, Damon Goduto. Headquartered in Dallas, and with offices throughout North and South America, Europe, Middle East, and APAC, Lineal has been delivering pioneering solutions since 2009.
Established in 2009, Lineal specializes in comprehensive eDiscovery services, leveraging its proprietary technology suite, Amplify , to enhance efficiency and accuracy in handling large volumes of electronic data.
I could imagine what would come—what did come—with predictive analysis platforms like Lex Machina that could equip attorneys with data-driven insights extracted from historical legal records, facilitating informed decision-making throughout various stages of litigation. Bloomsbury, 2009. Oxford University Press, 2009.
. “Achieving this honor two years in a row energizes us to work harder and partner greater as we strive to achieve our mission of reshaping the litigation services space.” Its SaaS product RelativityOne manages large volumes of data and quickly identifies key issues during litigation and internal investigations.
Headquartered in Dallas, and with offices throughout North and South Americas, Europe, Middle East, and APAC, Lineal has been delivering pioneering solutions since 2009. Its SaaS product, RelativityOne, manages large volumes of data and quickly identifies key issues during litigation and internal investigations.
Headquartered in Dallas, and with offices throughout the North and South Americas, Europe, and Asia, Lineal has been delivering pioneering solutions since 2009. For media inquiries, please contact: Marketing marketing@linealservices.com Learn more at www.lineal.com or connect with us on Twitter and LinkedIn.
In 2009, Autonomy acquired Interwoven for $775 million, and then in 2011 Hewlett Packard purchased Autonomy for $11.1 Unfortunately, for HP, the Autonomy acquisition turned into a fiasco due to alleged accounting improprieties by Autonomy, resulting in both litigation and a write-down of nearly $8.8 billion of the purchase price.
Conversely, a strategic collaboration between legal teams and technology solutions and service can profoundly influence the outcome of litigation or an investigation. For example, in a litigation or investigation , attorneys will be rightly focused on the legal requirements of responding to the pleading, subpoena or regulator inquiry.
But after Autonomy gobbled up Interwoven in 2009 and then Hewlett Packard bought Autonomy in 2011, the deal turned into a disaster when allegations that Autonomy had inflated its value resulted in HP having to write off nearly $8.8 billion purchase price and years of litigation that continues even now. billion of the $11.1
In 2009, Autonomy acquired Interwoven for $775 million, and then in 2011 Hewlett Packard purchased Autonomy for $11.1 The Autonomy acquisition turned into a fiasco for HP due to alleged accounting improprieties by Autonomy, resulting in both litigation and a write-down of nearly $8.8 billion, getting iManage in the deal.
This growth was notably broad-based, spanning both transactional and counter-cyclical practices, with litigation growing 3.3% in 2005-2009 to 19.1% .” Rapidly Evolving Market Demand for legal services grew by 2.6% in 2024, marking the strongest genuine growth since before the 2008 financial crisis. during the same period.
This proactive approach to eDiscovery is enabling legal teams to strategize more effectively, identify potential issues before they arise, and reduce the overall cost and duration of litigation.
Nonetheless, the majority opinion will have significant practical implications for transnational litigation in all IP areas. As noted by one transnational litigation scholar , this test would have “made the place of the conduct producing the evil, rather than the place of the transaction, determinative.” Yes, and no.
The need for contextual awareness allows you to understand the legal relevance of data and its implications in litigation or regulatory inquiries. Collaborative Synergy: Engaging with stakeholders across different departments to gather fresh insights and perspectives on the data’s potential uses.
Jim Grogan, who worked with Larkin for 40 years at the ARDC and served as Deputy Administrator and Chief Counsel, said Larkin always conducted himself as a “gentleman” during litigation. “He She is an extraordinarily gifted litigator with great judgment on what a case is and what it doesn’t have to be.
This not only makes review and production more efficient but allows for much easier research and recall of key information after discovery is closed and matters move toward the later phases of litigation or investigations.
In litigation, arbitration, or compliance, the strategic use of metadata can uncover pivotal insights, making it an indispensable tool in the legal toolkit. The ability to understand and interpret this data can be the difference between winning and losing a case.
Seeber shares the origin story of Level Legal, starting from its humble beginnings in 2009 in East Texas, evolving from a document review team within a law firm to a full-service eDiscovery and forensics company based in Dallas. Joey Seeber 3:51 Level Legal started on the 20th of January 2009. But tell me about this little team.
LexMachina Legal Analytics for Insurance Litigation includes more than 93,000 cases pending in federal court since 2009 to provide insight and trends in insurance case timing, resolutions, damages, remedies and findings.
For example, in 2009, Massachusetts enacted several substantive requirements, including a written comprehensive information security program that contains administrative, technical, and physical controls. Code Ann. §§ 14-3502(b), 14‑3503. Other Reasonable Security Laws have imposed more detailed and onerous cybersecurity requirements.
If nothing else, litigants know where they stand in these jurisdictions. 2009) (holding that a contract was not preempted by copyright). Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. But normative judgments aside, ProCD v. Contracts cannot be preempted by Section 301(a).
In 2009, Autonomy acquired Interwoven for $775 million, and then in 2011 Hewlett Packard purchased Autonomy for $11.1 But the Autonomy acquisition turned into a fiasco for HP due to alleged accounting improprieties by Autonomy, resulting in both litigation and a write-down of nearly $8.8 billion, getting iManage in the deal.
In 2009, Autonomy acquired Interwoven for $775 million, and then in 2011 Hewlett Packard purchased Autonomy for $11.1 The Autonomy acquisition turned into a fiasco for HP due to alleged accounting improprieties by Autonomy, resulting in both litigation and a write-down of nearly $8.8 billion, getting iManage in the deal.
Fusing Brian’s knowledge of advanced analytics and AI with Lineal’s award-winning NLP-driven Relativity applications is a hole-in-one for our litigation services business,” said Kent Teague, Chairman and CEO of Lineal. For media inquiries, please contact: marketing@linealservices.com Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
657 (2021) by SUSANNAH CAMIC TAHK , UW Law School We know that pro se litigants often lose. This Article calls those favorable precedents for pro se litigants “spillover precedents.” Spillover precedents are cases with redistributive downward ripple effects that subsequently benefit pro se litigants.
In 2009, we found the actual expert. It's just a really, really high standard, and it's another process of litigation. in 3 million or whatever he was convicted, went to prison. That expert not only recanted his own testimony in the case, but said Biomark evidence should not be used in criminal courts. She had to turn herself in.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content