article thumbnail

Clarifying the Lifecycle of Construction Disputes: eDiscovery and Forensic Readiness in the UAE

Lineal Services

This shift enables them not only to defend their position but to actively shape the course of the dispute. Established in 2009, Lineal specializes in comprehensive eDiscovery services, leveraging its proprietary technology s uit e, Amplify to enh ance efficiency and accuracy in handling large volumes of electronic data.

article thumbnail

Amplify™ Review for APAC: Accelerating Internal Investigations with Clarity, Control, and Compliance

Lineal Services

Defensible Processes : Every step is auditable and transparent, helping legal teams defend process integrity if challenged. Established in 2009, Lineal specializes in comprehensive eDiscovery services, leveraging its proprietary technology s uit e, Amplify to enh ance efficiency and accuracy in handling large volumes of electronic data.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

South Carolina Damages: A Different Type of “Blue Book”

The Barrister

Punitive damages serve to punish defendants for their behavior. 2009 & Supp. D3 S68 2009. Punitive damages are the rarest of the three. Because of this, punitive damages require the greatest burden of proof in civil cases: clear and convincing evidence. Part two details where compensatory damages apply in South Carolina.

article thumbnail

Navigating eDiscovery in the Chat and Collaboration Era

Lineal Services

Established in 2009, Lineal specializes in comprehensive eDiscovery services , leveraging its proprietary technology suite, Amplify , to enhance efficiency and accuracy in handling large volumes of electronic data. Courts are ruling that chat data is mandatory in productions taking for example Benebone v. Pet Qwerks, et al.

article thumbnail

Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

The 2009 Facebook Terms included the following clause: “accessing or using our website. at 18 (quoting the 2009 version of the Terms at issue in Fteja v. 2d 316, 319 (1953) (invalidating trial court’s interpretation of land purchase agreement as binding the defendant to pay all land assessments without time limitations).

Judge 98
article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

It’s that every new case related to the law of copyright preemption of contracts leaves lawyers with a potential new set of arguments to defend or argue against with the law of copyright preemption. 2009) (holding that a contract was not preempted by copyright). Three courts of appeals have answered “no.” 634 F.Supp.2d

Judge 98
article thumbnail

YouTube Isn’t Liable for User Uploads of Animal Abuse Videos–Lady Freethinker v. YouTube

Eric Goldman

Same thing with the Lori Drew prosecution from 2009). However, if you’re an old-timer like me, you’ll recognize how this exact argument was tried–and failed–in Noah v. AOL from 2003, a case I still include in my Internet Law casebook.