Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 13, 2023

But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. At the circuit court level, the law of copyright preemption of contracts is a circuit split-plus, with at least two and as many as four differentiating positions on what might constitute preemption. 2d 426, 433 (8th Cir.1993)

Judge 98

Judge Court Defendant State law 98

Legal Tech Monitor

OCTOBER 27, 2023

After just a couple of years at the ARDC—an entity charged by the Illinois Supreme Court with upholding the legal profession’s integrity in Illinois—Larkin began to realize he might have found the place where he could accomplish his mission. “As He was a gentleman when he appeared before the court,” Grogan said. “He

Court 52

Court Attorney Failure-to-appear Litigator 52

LawSites

DECEMBER 29, 2021

In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?

Legal tech 52

Legal tech Legal tech Practice management e-filing 52

InsideLegal

JANUARY 23, 2019

LexMachina Legal Analytics for Insurance Litigation includes more than 93,000 cases pending in federal court since 2009 to provide insight and trends in insurance case timing, resolutions, damages, remedies and findings.

Legal technology 40

Legal technology Legal technology Judge Analytics 40

Legal Tech Monitor

FEBRUARY 7, 2024

Seeber shares the origin story of Level Legal, starting from its humble beginnings in 2009 in East Texas, evolving from a document review team within a law firm to a full-service eDiscovery and forensics company based in Dallas. Joey Seeber 3:51 Level Legal started on the 20th of January 2009. But tell me about this little team.

Hearing 52

Hearing Legal tech Legal tech Law firm 52

Eric Goldman

JULY 17, 2023

the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). Nonetheless, the majority opinion will have significant practical implications for transnational litigation in all IP areas. First, the Court had to address its longstanding precedent in Steele v.

Court 75

Court Defendant Litigator Litigation 75

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 18, 2024

My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.

Law 111

Law Law Court Intellectual Property 111

Wisblawg

JULY 31, 2023

657 (2021) by SUSANNAH CAMIC TAHK , UW Law School We know that pro se litigants often lose. This Article calls those favorable precedents for pro se litigants “spillover precedents.” Spillover precedents are cases with redistributive downward ripple effects that subsequently benefit pro se litigants.

Law 40

Law Law Litigator Litigation 40

Lawmatics

DECEMBER 6, 2023

In fact, you have to petition the courts to see, you have to petition the other side to see if the information or exhibits even still exist. In 2009, we found the actual expert. That expert not only recanted his own testimony in the case, but said Biomark evidence should not be used in criminal courts. But he wasn't released.

Prosecutor 52

Prosecutor Time-tracking Court Judge 52

LawSites

MARCH 22, 2022

A commercial litigation attorney with the firm Meyer Capel P.C. Since 2015, she has served on the Illinois Supreme Court Committee on Equality. Wright Memorial Award for appellate advocacy in the Ames Moot Court Competition. She joined the commission as deputy director in 2006 and was appointed executive director in 2009.

Court 52

Court Litigator Litigation Legal education 52

Berkley Technology Law Journal

JULY 11, 2022

The risk assessment tool was first introduced in 2009 by the new Obama administration. These are individuals if they have a credible claim for relief from removal, they have every reason to show up in immigration court for their hearings, these are the things that a risk tool, ostensibly measures. It was piloted in 2011–2012.

Law 40

Law Law Time-tracking Lawsuit 40

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 14, 2025

Capitol Records (the successor to EMI) sent its first cease-and-desist letter to Vimeo in 2008 and sued Vimeo for copyright infringement in 2009. The district court’s rulings became final in 2021. If law professors can’t agree about fair use, I guess the court thinks no one can? (A Yes, this is a 15-year-old lawsuit.[FN]

Defendant 92

Defendant Court Lawsuit Judge 92

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 14, 2022

A CID is a type of Commissioner-authorized subpoena, enforceable in court, that subjects the recipient to a number of formalized processes and timelines. FTC unanimously held that Section 13(b) of the FTCA does not grant the FTC authority to obtain monetary remedies in federal court. 18] In FTC v. Shire ViroPharma, Inc. ,

Compliance 52

Compliance Court Litigator Litigation 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 9, 2025

9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.

Law 102

Law Law Court Lawsuit 102