This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Although there are numerous commercially-available research platforms, Google Scholar caselaw continues to be a valuable legal resource available to lawyers, law students, and the general public, free of charge. Here we delve into how Google Scholar caselaw works and how best to utilize it.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. Three courts of appeals have answered “no.” ” National Car Rental System, Inc.
What makes a case exceptional? before the US Court of Appeals for the Central District of California, it was a recently decided that a case is not per se exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § The district court granted Uniclass’motion for summary judgment on ATEN’s lost profits theory. In the matter of ATEN International Co.,
When Jerome “Jerry” Larkin joined the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) in 1978, he had just graduated from Loyola University Chicago School of Law, spent eight years in the Catholic seminary system, and knew he wanted to dedicate his career to public service. He was a gentleman in dealings with his opponents.
Spillover precedents are cases with redistributive downward ripple effects that subsequently benefit pro se litigants. To focus the inquiry, the Article carried out an empirical study of Tax Courtcases from 2015-2019 in which pro se litigants won. reason was being employed in the case.
The risk assessment tool was first introduced in 2009 by the new Obama administration. These are individuals if they have a credible claim for relief from removal, they have every reason to show up in immigration court for their hearings, these are the things that a risk tool, ostensibly measures. It was piloted in 2011–2012.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content