Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2024

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”

Court 105

Court e-discovery Defendant e-filing 105

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 7, 2016

The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. The City further argued that since the Plaintiff’s had overly broad discovery requests, they should not be sanctioned for failing to preserve relevant ESI. City of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2, 2016) 2016 U.S. LEXIS 868, at *1. 153, 164-66 (S.D.N.Y.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation e-discovery e-filing 52

Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. The respondent files a response to the claim.

e-filing 105

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 105

Eric Goldman

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

The court ought to push back on such rhetorical overclaims rather than rubberstamp them to discovery. That ruling focused primarily on 230(e)(2), the IP exception to 230, but the case only reaches that issue based on the initial applicability of 230(c)(1). Grindr has unsurprisingly filed objections to the report.

Court 105

Court Lawsuit Judge Defendant 105