LawSites

JANUARY 19, 2023

Among the things the two e-discovery companies Exterro and Zapproved have in common is that they were both founded in the same year, 2008, and in the same city, Portland, Ore. Learn more about Exterro products on the LawNext Legal Tech Directory: Exterro E-Discovery Data Management , Exterro Legal Hold , Exterro Review.

e-discovery 98

e-discovery Compliance Software Legal tech 98

LawSites

JULY 25, 2022

Read about Exterro Review and Exterro E-Discovery Data Management on the LawNext Legal Technology Directory. “These are critical requirements to operating in the face of challenges across e-discovery, data privacy, cybersecurity, and forensic investigations.”

e-discovery 98

e-discovery Compliance Software Legal technology 98

Joshua Gilliland

JANUARY 7, 2016

The Court found that the duty to preserve was the date of an earlier lawsuit involving quota-related allegations that was “strikingly similar” to the instant case, which was January 31, 2008, opposed to the date of the current lawsuit, filed on May 25, 2010. Stinson , at *10-11, referencing Floyd v. City of New York, 283 F.R.D.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation e-discovery e-filing 52

Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. Others have dropped out because they did not pass the compliance review, the respondent opted out, or for other reasons). This is done by a staff attorney.

e-filing 105

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 105